Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Thx Doug for updating the ed's doc list.
I guess we can use that as our "CVS" for now.

+1 to not notifying the TC for every minor edit.

-Anish
--

Doug Davis wrote:
> 
> Just added the doc to the editor's doc list - so while its not cvs at 
> least a note should not be sent out to the entire tc each time we make a 
> minor edit.  I can live with this.
> -Doug
> 
> 
> 
> *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>*
> 
> 09/19/2005 08:33 PM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
> 	ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject
> 	Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This exactly why we really really really need CVS, now.
> The reason I did not change it (although it was trivial to do so) was
> because I did not want to update the website for such a small change and
> I did not want to prevent other editors from making a (different) change
> to the document (write-after-write).
> 
> I guess, till we have a CVS we'll have to live with such an arrangement.
> Sigh!
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Doug Davis wrote:
>  >
>  > Already have a fix for this - just removed the extension from the
>  > filename.  I didn't update the file on the website 'cause I've been
>  > updating it too much today and was waiting for a more significant change
>  > :-)
>  > -Doug
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>*
>  >
>  > 09/19/2005 07:44 PM
>  >
>  >                  
>  > To
>  >                  "Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>
>  > cc
>  >                  ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>  > Subject
>  >                  Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
>  >
>  >
>  >                  
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Can we add this as an Action Item in the WS-RX Editors SC?
>  > I don't have the permission (I assume, since I don't see the 'add
>  > Action' button) to do so. Can you add this or give me the right 
> permissions?
>  >
>  > This AI list can serve as our TODO list. Once we have enuf of these
>  > things, we can generate a new draft periodically OR roll it in with
>  > other substantial changes/issue resolution.
>  >
>  > I can fix this, but don't want to generate too may draft that would make
>  > it hard for everyone to track. Which reminds me: we really need the CVS.
>  > IIRC, we were only going to wait for a few weeks for OASIS to get its
>  > act together (and it hasn't). Else we were planning on using
>  > sourceforge. Not having CVS is very frustrating. What's the status on
>  > resolving the IPR/legal issues (if any) wrt using sourceforge?
>  >
>  > -Anish
>  > --
>  >
>  >
>  > Patil, Sanjay wrote:
>  >  > The footer note in the pdf document reads - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw
>  >  >
>  >  > Thanks,
>  >  > Sanjay
>  >
>