[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues
Can the editors please be prepared to give an update on the CD on this Thursday's conference call. Paul Anish Karmarkar wrote: > As you may have seen I checked in drafts to fix issues i017, i045 and > i046. For 17, I picked 200510 as the 'YYYYMM'. > > +1 to waiting to have a fix for i024. > > I think we are done wrt wsrm doc based on the issues that Paul sent. > Thanks Dug for doing the heavy lifting. > > Here is a summary (of the issues that Paul sent out) for the WSRM doc: > > 1) Closed issues that require no change to the doc -- > 3, 4, 12, 14, 18, 26 > > 2) Issues that do require action and should now be 'editors - done' -- > 5, 11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 27, 28, 20, 25, 29, 31, 33, 34, 39, 40 > > 3) New proposed issues -- > NewProposed01 (issue i036) closed with no action > Proposed04 (issue i036) done > Proposed05 (issue i040) done > Proposed11 (issue i045) done > Proposed12 (issue i046) done > > -Anish > -- > > Doug Davis wrote: >> >> Editors, >> I think the only one left is: i024 - didn't do because I wanted the >> TC to agree on Ashok's text first. >> and haven't looked at the 'proposed' issues yet. >> >> -Doug >> >> >> >> *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>* >> >> 09/25/2005 07:03 PM >> Please respond to >> paul >> >> >> >> To >> >> cc >> ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject >> [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Editors >> >> Here is my figuring on what needs to go into the Committee Draft: >> >> Issues resolved up to and including the F2F to be included in CD >> ================================================================ >> >> Issues closed, 4, 12, 14, 18 >> >> Issues requiring editor input from F2F >> ====================================== >> >> i001 Bilateral sequence negotiation >> i005 Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received >> i011 Typo in expires P0S >> i013 Max message number in policy >> i015 Required Artifact Metadata >> i016 Document Identifiers >> i017 XML Namespace URIs >> i019 Sequence termination on Fault >> i027 InOrder delivery assurance spanning multiple sequences >> i028 Accurate final acknowledgement of a Sequence with gaps when >> RMS decides to stop using it >> >> Issues resolved at the Seattle F2F >> ================================== >> >> Issue 20 - meaning of at most once DA >> Issue 9 - policy assertion for Delivery Assurance. >> While this doesn't make HUGE amounts of sense without the text >> describing where it goes, I suggest we add it to the document - which is >> what the vote agreed >> >> Issue 26 - space greedy. Closed >> Issue 24 - Observed text. >> Issue 25 - Seqack when no messages received. >> Issue 29 - Security Token Reference removed >> Issue 3 - Close, no action >> Issue 25 - Sequence ack where no messages received >> Issue 31 - Schema inconsistency >> Issue 33 - NACK processing >> Issue 34 - Faults on piggybacking >> >> NewProposed01 - DuplicateDetection of CSMs - closed no action >> >> Edits from Seattle F2F agreed as Action Items >> ====================================== >> Proposed04 >> Proposed05 >> Proposed11 >> Proposed12 >> >> >> Proposed13 is NOT to be in CD (so as to minimise change bars) >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> -- >> Paul Fremantle >> Co-Founder, Vice President of Technology >> WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" >> >> Yahoo IM: paulfremantle >> Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729 >> Fax: +1 360 485-4275 >> paul@wso2.com >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]