[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Request for updating the targets in the issueslist
Great, thx! -Anish -- Marc Goodner wrote: > I don't know off the top of my head without checking the schema since I > haven't tried it. Umit's right though, I'll enable it if it doesn't. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com] > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:22 PM > To: Anish Karmarkar; Marc Goodner > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Request for updating the targets in the > issues list > > I like the categorization as well. > > I believe the list allows it, but Marc is the authorative answer. If it > does not, it should be enabled. > > --umit > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] >>Sent: Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 10:17 PM >>To: Marc Goodner >>Cc: Yalcinalp, Umit; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Request for updating the targets >>in the issues list >> >>+1 >> >>Does the list allow the an issue to have a target of 'wsrm' >>*and* wsrmp? >> >>-Anish >>-- >> >>Marc Goodner wrote: >> >>>Sure, changing the targets to mean an actual deliverable >> >>makes a lot >> >>>more sense. This was another carryover from the source >> >>schema I used for >> >>>the issue list. They seemed more conceptual than related to actual >>>deliverables. >>> >>> >>> >>>Here would be my proposed list: >>> >>> * wsrm >>> * wsrm-schema >>> * wsrm-wsdl >>> * wsrmp >>> * wsrmp-schema >>> >>> >>> >>>Am I missing anything or does that look right? >>> >>> >>> >>>Also, if an issue is the schema or wsdl has an error the target is >>>obvious. If the issue involves a change to the spec that >> >>impacts the >> >>>schema or wsdl it seems that we don't need to log that in >> >>the target. I >> >>>would trust the editors would see the connection without >> >>having both the >> >>>spec and the schema tagged as a target in such cases. >>> >>> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>---------- >> >>>*From:* Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com] >>>*Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2005 2:14 PM >>>*To:* Marc Goodner >>>*Cc:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >>>*Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] Request for updating the targets in the >>>issues list >>> >>> >>> >>>Marc, >>> >>>Would you be able to update the targets in the issues list >> >>with more >> >>>meaningful references? What we label is core is not really >> >>"core" per >> >>>se. I would prefer to get the deliverables represented as >> >>the targets so >> >>>that we can keep track of our work. >>> >>> For example Issue 001 relates to the policy spec, ditto >> >>i013, i016/17 >> >>>apply to both targets... >>> >>>It is easier to keep track of the changes that way. >>> >>>Thanks. >>> >>>--umit >>> >>> >>> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]