RE: [ws-rx-editors] Would any one of you do a sanity check for the wsrmp document?

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, Oct 06, 2005 12:49 AM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Would any one of you do a sanity 
> check for the wsrmp document?
> 
> I reviewed wsrmp doc at 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
nload.php/14772/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-01_diff.pdf
> based on the changelog at the end. Looks good.
> 
> Two comments:
> 1) spurious 'a' on line 213
> 2) lines 297-299 say:
> "The Delivery Assurance indicates a delivery assurance claim observed 
> between an Application
> Source and an RM Source or an Application Destination and an RM 
> Destination. The semantics
> of the delivery assurance is defined in WS-ReliableMessaging [WS-RM],"
> 
> I would suggest the following instead:
> "The wsrmp:DeliveryAssurance specifies the Delivery Assurance 
> as defined 
> by [WS-RM]."
> 
> Mostly, because wsrm spec does not say the "... observed between ..." 
> part. Just pointing to WS-RM spec would mean that even if the text in 
> WS-RM spec about DAs change (and there are issues filed about it) the 
> WSRMP spec text would not change.

That is a good suggestion. I will incorporate that. 

--umit

> 
> HTH.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> > I propose we publish it to the tc before the concall tomorrow.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > --umit
> > 
> > 
>