Re: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the posted 05 document

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

this raises the question of how to handle
any fixes for the draft CDs.  Resetting the 2-week clock each time
isn't good.  So I suggest that at the end of the 2 weeks we post another
diff'd version - where the original version is the draft CD w/all changes
accepted - and the diff'd version shows just the changes we made since
the posting of the draft CDs.  In there we can include the fix to
the section 4 formatting.
-Doug

Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>

10/07/2005 08:46 PM

To	"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
cc	ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the posted 05 document

Umit,

Thanks for pointing this out. You're right, we need to do 'Tools->Update
All' before generating the PDFs. I looked at the two docs (more pairs of
eyes are most welcome) -- sxw and pdf versions -- and the only problem
that I saw (wrt updating of indexes) was with the 'Table of Contents'.
Fortunately, there is no problem with the line numbers. So this in 
itself would not require us to generate another draft.

But I noticed another problem. In the #2 version at [1] updated by Gil,
the formating for 'Fault', section 4, was removed. As a result the old
section 4 was included as subsections of 3. This got carried forward in
subsequent drafts (if you recall I had pointed this out earlier on this
ML [2]).

Not sure if this requires us to generate another draft that is uploaded
to the main TC page. Since the 2 week clock started yesterday, changing
the daft now may make some people unhappy. If folks look at the diff-ed
version though it is much clearer as to what happened.

I'm inclined not to do any updates to the main page right now and 
include this as a change when we approve the CD at the end of the two 
week's period.

Thoughts?

-Anish
--

[1] 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/14670/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-05.sxw
[2] 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/email/archives/200509/msg00056.html

Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> I ran into this problem today with Policy spec and realized that the
> posted version for WSRM spec has a similar issue (I corrected mine
> before posting it though :-))
> 
> When you generate pdfs (no change bars) either after accepting 
> changes/turning of change bars, you must regenerate the indexes from
> Tools. Otherwise, the index does not align with the spec sections
and 
> pages.
> 
> Just another day in paradise,
> 
> --umit
> 
>