RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Editorial issues with WD 05

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

And another thing, receive is defined twice (and differently each time)
at lines 237 and 246.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Anish Karmarkar
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Editorial issues with WD 05

Sorry, 4 below is more wrong than I thought. After line 3 and before
line 4 Document Identifier exists on the first page as a title and with
no line number. That should be after a page break and line 4 should be
wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-05 with 05 probably being whatever the next revision
number is. Also I guess this means line 60 should say WD right?

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:42 PM
To: Anish Karmarkar
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Editorial issues with WD 05

Here are some other editorial issues I've found by line number.

4 Still identified as ED draft
60 Shouldn't that be CD?
184 extra space between accurately and determine
187 The capitalized incorrectly, should be the
633 Why does this line start with OPTIONAL? Any other optional
elements/attributes are called out in the immediate line after they are
declared. Furthermore I'm not sure this is optional, it is an
extensibility point and as such I don't think anyone is supposed to barf
if it is used. Earlier in the spec it clearly says unknown extensions
should be ignored.
1141, 1155, 1159, 1160 undefined namespace prefix of ws is used, should
be xs

Not sure if I'll get to the policy doc today or not, I'll try.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:22 PM
To: wsrx
Subject: [ws-rx] Editorial issues with WD 05

All,

The editors would like to point out three ed issues against WSRM WD-05
[1]:

1) The pages numbers in the 'Table of Contents' aren't correct. OO 
requires that all the indexes be regenerated once changes are accepted, 
before generating the PDF. That was not done before generating the PDF 
at [1].

2) There was a editorial regression. Line 678 in [1] says:
"to the element.Faults"
This really should be:
"to the element." and "Faults" should be on a new line and formated as a

separate section (section 4). Because of this regression, subsections 
that were previously subsections of section 4 are now subsections of 3 
instead.

3) Robin Cover pointed out an editorial bug on line 124. Given that our 
NS ends with a trailing '/' (http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/200510/), 
line 124 should be:
"reliable messaging namespace URI concatenated with the"
instead of:
"reliable messaging namespace URI concatenated with the "/" character 
and the"

-Anish
--

[1] 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/14785/ws
rm-1.1-spec-wd-05.pdf