Re: [ws-rx-editors] References

[Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>]

+1

Paul


Marc Goodner wrote:
> Not from me, good call.
>
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 10:39 AM
> To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-rx-editors] References
>
>  
>
> Folks, 
>
> After Marc's comment, I went through both of the documents and found out
> that there is inconsistency as to how references are classified
> non-normative vs. normative. 
>
> Initially, I classified all the references in the policy document as
> non-normative with the intent that the tc will make a decision. After
> thinking through, I think that this issue should be discussed with the
> tc, instead of making an editorial decision as the decision may not be
> editorial. (Marc, you raised this and I would like to take this to the
> tc at this point). 
>
> I looked at the WS-RM document itself has listed all the references as
> normative except policy related ones as non-normative. So, I am not sure
> how certain references are blessed to be normative and some of them are
> not non-normative, such as WS-Policy. I don't recall making a decision
> about them. 
>
> I think before we start moving references from one section to another,
> the tc needs to determine, just like WS-Addressing reference to use
> which references are normative, which are not normative, etc. As editors
> we can always make a proposal, but I would rather get this recorded. 
>
> Any opinions before I publish the issue to the tc? 
>
> --umit 
>
>  
>
>
>   


-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Yahoo IM: paulfremantle
VOIP: +44 844 986 2874
Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729
Fax:  +44 844 484 7459 
paul@wso2.com