[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01
|
The boilerplate being used for the cover
page of this CD is wrong. There is information there that is inaccurate and in
my opinion misleading. It should not be applied on the grounds that it is in
the OASIS templates/samples and in other TC CDs. The primary problem is the public review link.
The TC did not approve this CD for public review. That link simply should not
be in this CD. I specifically asked if this was a public
review and was repeatedly told no. It has been emphasized on our calls that
this was not going to be up for public review. Insisting on this link because
it is part of the boilerplate seems wrong to me. I don’t think any editorial
comment about that link not being monitored or the TC not accepting public
comment at this time could be strong enough. Why would you give someone the
link if they are not supposed to use it? It certainly implies that the TC will
be taking comments on this CD at some point in time which is contrary to the
direction we were given. Furthermore the comment form does not seem
like it should be there if the TC has not released a CD for public review yet. Currently
the form seems to be active but the links to the archive itself do not function.
Who even monitors mail sent to this alias? I am less concerned about the errata link.
Again though, I just don’t understand why we would put boilerplate text
with a link to a document we never intend to produce in a CD. Look, boilerplate is boilerplate. Why are
we insisting on inserting information into our first CD that is wrong because
it is part of a template. If it doesn’t apply it doesn’t apply.
Strike it. Wsrm: Remove this text from lines 36 – 38: Others
should use the comment form at http://www.oasisopen. org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=ws-rx. [ed.
note - Comments are not being accepted at this time.] Remove lines 43 – 45 If
necessary, the errata page for this version of of the specification will be
located at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/documents/errata/1.1/index.html. [ed.
note – There is no errata at this time.] Wsrmp: Remove this text from lines 29 – 31: Others
should use the comment form at http://www.oasisopen. org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=ws-rx. [ed.
note - Comments are not being accepted at this time.] Remove lines 36 – 38 If
necessary, the errata page for this version of of the specification will be
located at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/documents/errata/1.1/index.html. [ed.
note – There is no errata at this time.] From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] PDF for both please. From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Same deal for WS-RM Policy. - g |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]