[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01
Here's the latests revisions of the CDs incorporating Sanjay's suggestions. - g > -----Original Message----- > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:06 PM > To: James Bryce Clark; mgoodner@microsoft.com; paul@wso2.com > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01 > > > I think we have to nail down the issue of status text rather > quickly before the links for CD I are published. > > How about removing the text that refers to the public > comments mailing list, web form, errata page, etc. I don't > see very many issues with the rest of the status text. Here > is the cut-paste of the edited text for your quick reference. > Please chime in and raise your opinion if you are ok with > this text. If there are no concerns, I propose to include > this in the CD I revs. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > ----------------------------------- > This document was last revised or approved by the OASIS WS-RX > TC on the above date. The level of approval is also listed > above. Check the current location noted above for possible > later revisions of this document. > > For information on whether any patents have been disclosed > that may be essential to implementing this specification, and > any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the > Intellectual Property Rights section of the Technical > Committee web page (www.oasis-open.org/committees/[TC short > name] /ipr.php. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > ------------------------------------ > > Thanks, > Sanjay > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, Oct 25, 2005 16:51 PM > > To: mgoodner@microsoft.com; Patil, Sanjay; paul@wso2.com > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01 > > > > Please keep my colleague Mary McRae in the loop on > this feedback, > > as she is in charge of the templates and (when a spec > reaches a higher > > level of approval) compliance with them. Copying her here. I will > > share my take on these issues with her, and ask her to work > them out > > with the committee. Regards JBC > > > > At 12:13 PM 10/28/2005, Marc Goodner wrote: > > >Ive looked into this further and have also determined that > > the boilerplate > > >is exceptionally dated. The instructions there are from > > 2002/3 so can not > > >possibly reflect current realities at OASIS since the > > updated process > > >policy and IPR changes. As a very relevant example, the text > > and link > > >regarding comments should only apply to a Public Review > > Draft according to > > >the OASIS process, not any CD. The boilerplate is in error > > and should be > > >corrected. > > >In the end I believe the TC should follow the intent of the > > OASIS Process, > > >instead of incorrect and outdated boilerplate material, and > > remove these links > > > > > >>From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] > > >>Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:57 AM > > >>To: Marc Goodner; Paul Fremantle; James Bryce Clark > > >>Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > >>Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01 > > >> > > >>+1 > > >>We should adapt the boiler plate to reflects our realities. > > >>Thanks, > > >>Sanjay > > >> > > >>>From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] > > >>>Sent: Thursday, Oct 27, 2005 22:13 PM > > >>>To: Paul Fremantle; Patil, Sanjay; James Bryce Clark > > >>>Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > >>>Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01 > > >>>Importance: High > > >>> > > >>>The boilerplate being used for the cover page of this CD > > is wrong. There > > >>>is information there that is inaccurate and in my opinion > > misleading. It > > >>>should not be applied on the grounds that it is in the OASIS > > >>>templates/samples and in other TC CDs. > > >>>The primary problem is the public review link. The TC did > > not approve > > >>>this CD for public review. That link simply should not be > > in this CD. > > >>>I specifically asked if this was a public review and was > > repeatedly told > > >>>no. It has been emphasized on our calls that this was not > > going to be up > > >>>for public review. Insisting on this link because it is > > part of the > > >>>boilerplate seems wrong to me. I dont think any editorial > > comment about > > >>>that link not being monitored or the TC not accepting > > public comment at > > >>>this time could be strong enough. Why would you give > > someone the link if > > >>>they are not supposed to use it? It certainly implies that > > the TC will > > >>>be taking comments on this CD at some point in time which > > is contrary to > > >>>the direction we were given. > > >>>Furthermore the comment form does not seem like it should > > be there if > > >>>the TC has not released a CD for public review yet. > > Currently the form > > >>>seems to be active but the links to the archive itself do > > not function. > > >>>Who even monitors mail sent to this alias? > > >>>I am less concerned about the errata link. Again though, I > > just dont > > >>>understand why we would put boilerplate text with a link > > to a document > > >>>we never intend to produce in a CD. > > >>>Look, boilerplate is boilerplate. Why are we insisting on > > inserting > > >>>information into our first CD that is wrong because it is > > part of a > > >>>template. If it doesnt apply it doesnt apply. Strike it. > > >>> > > >>>Wsrm: > > >>>Remove this text from lines 36 38: > > >>>Others should use the comment form at http://www.oasisopen. > > >>>org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=ws-rx. [ed. > > note - Comments > > >>>are not being accepted at this time.] > > >>> > > >>>Remove lines 43 45 > > >>>If necessary, the errata page for this version of of the > > specification > > >>>will be located at > > >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/documents/errata > > /1.1/index.html. > > >>>[ed. note > > >>>There is no errata at this time.] > > >>> > > >>>* * * > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]