Re: [ws-rx-editors] Editor process doc

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Marc,

This is a good document to have, but it does not solve your original 
problem of missed ed changes before publishing the CD. What we need is a 
Editors TODO list. Which will allow us to ensure that the published 
drafts do contain all the agreed upon changes.

-Anish
--

PS: I agree with you that the TC short name is ws-rx (and not wsrx) and 
we don't have a choice about it. IIRC, this is in the charter).

Marc Goodner wrote:
> I’ve taken another pass over this document reflecting my last 
> suggestions regarding document names etc. (I know we haven’t closed on 
> that). I’ve added a lot more structure around the various stages, 
> locations, and review process.
> 
>  
> 
> If no one objects I’m going to upload to the editor area on Kavi and we 
> can continue refining this as people have a chance to review it.
> 
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 08, 2005 4:41 PM
> *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] Editor process doc
> 
>  
> 
> All,
> 
>  
> 
> I took the document Sanjay sent earlier with the document identifiers 
> and added some text from the WSN doc as well as collected some of our 
> notes on desirable process steps. If this looks like a good base to 
> start from I can upload it to the editors’ area on Kavi and we can 
> continue refining it.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards, Marc g
> 
>  
> 
> Note:  I did not change any of the identifiers Sanjay proposed. I still 
> prefer the TC short form name, ws-rx, and not having the TC short form 
> name in the identifiers. I didn’t feel it was appropriate for me to 
> reflect just my own preferences here though.
>