Re: [ws-rx-editors] reorder WD

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Marc Goodner wrote:
> Looking back at the issue process presentation I believe it is up to the 
> editors to determine when to move a ED stage doc to WD. I think the main 
> consideration there was simply that not too many WDs were being produced 
> that new ones came out before the last one was reviewed.
> 
>  
> 
> When a new WD gets produced all pending changes that are reflected there 
> move to “done”. After the TC reviews it and agrees those changes are 
> reflected the “done” issues move to “resolved”. That review isn’t 
> officially spelled out. I believe it was intended simply for someone in 
> the TC to report back that they were satisfied or not. I’m guessing this 
> could be handled by asking for someone to take an AI to review the done 
> issues in the WD and report back. All issues reflected in a CD get 
> marked as “closed”. Since I just did that review in updating the last 
> issue list version it might be worth calling people’s attention to on 
> the next call.
> 
>  
> 
> So only the CD requires an official approval by the TC unless I’m 
> missing something.
> 

You are correct, WDs don't require approval and at the last f2f we 
already decided to let the editors decide when to bring forward a new WD 
-- it is just a snapshot of where we are. And you are also right about 
the issue status change (you would be, since you are the keeper of the 
issues list) wrt to publishing a new WD.

-Anish
--

>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:54 PM
> *To:* Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] reorder WD
> 
>  
> 
> Giving a restructured WD to the TC at the earliest is a good idea. Any 
> new issues can reference it for line numbers, etc.
> 
>  
> 
> The other new issues that were recently (post CD 1) opened may need some 
> careful handling by the editors (since the line numbers, etc, would have 
> changed) but I am pretty sure that the editors team can handle that 
> challenge without any guidance.
> 
>  
> 
> I don't see why a formal TC approval of the restructured WD would be 
> necessary.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjay
> 
>      
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
>     *Sent:* Sunday, Nov 13, 2005 8:05 AM
>     *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>     *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] reorder WD
> 
> 
>     Editors,
>       we need a decision about the reordered WD - I say we make it
>     available to the TC for review - give 'em about a week or two (at
>     most) and then vote on approving it (if that's the process - dunno),
>     and then we can move on to making some of the other pending changes.
>     -Doug
>