[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Any ideas about my action item?
|
Agreed, I was going to point out to the TC
list that we haven’t figured this out yet. I couldn’t find an issue
that points to why this happened the last time I looked. Yeah, Umit I think you got pegged because
they gave the AI to the editors and as you note you weren’t on the call.
I don’t explicitly recall that happening though. I suggest we move this discussion to the
main list to see if anyone else recalls where this came from. From: Yalcinalp, Umit
[mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com] Folks,
I
got a friendly reminder from our chairs. Apparently, someone assigned me an
action item to find out the why we redefine receive for which there is an open
issue [1]. While I was not present in a concall, it got assigned to me
;-). Since wsrm spec is not what I normally focus on, I really do not have the
context here as to why we do have two different definitions. Could
someone (Doug or Anish) comment/take this item since you guys did the editing
on this spec? Thanks.
--umit
[1]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i070
Dr.
Umit Yalcinalp |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]