OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to include resolution for issues 22, 24, 54, 73


The wierdness in the diffs should settle down now that we have completed
the major chunk of formatting homogenization. There are still some
weirdnesses (like the fonts used for the line numbers) but both
documents are pretty consistent in their use of the "appropriate"
styles.

- g 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:34 PM
> To: Anish Karmarkar; WS-RX Editors
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to 
> include resolution for issues 22, 24, 54, 73
> 
> It looks like you missed applying i055.
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
s.xml#i055
> "Delete inactivity timeout."
> 
> Otherwise from a sanity check perspective this looks good. As 
> you note below the line number flux and the fact that some of 
> the proposals only use line numbers without text descriptions 
> make this hard to review without laying hard copies next to 
> each other. 
> 
> Also, I've noticed a lot of weirdness in the diffs. I don't 
> know if these are being generated in OO or Acrobat, either 
> way look for a setting to ignore formatting differences. It 
> really makes a mess with so many lines marked deleted and new 
> that are exactly the same.
> 
> Regards,
> Marc g
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:24 PM
> To: WS-RX Editors
> Subject: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to include 
> resolution for issues 22, 24, 54, 73
> 
> I have updated the wsrmp spec to include the resolution for 
> issues 22, 24, 54, 73 as agreed today.
> 
> The link for the sxw file is:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
nload.php/
> 15709/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-02.sxw
> 
> The PDF is attached to this email. The diff with CD01 (PDF) 
> is also attached.
> 
> Please let me know if there is anything missing and I'll fix it. 
> Anything else needs to be done in WSRMP doc for the F2F?
> 
> Please note that for some of the issue resolutions the line 
> numbers did not match (with the referenced spec in the 
> resolution email) or were incorrect. But I searched for the 
> right text and made the changes at the
> 
> right places. In addition, I had to make changes to the text 
> to incorporate the resolutions. Specifically, because we 
> deleted backoff and retransmission params, the example in the 
> spec changed (which was part of the resolution), which meant 
> that the line numbers in the example changed (which was not 
> part of the resolution), which meant that
> 
> the line numbers referenced in the text changed (which was 
> not part of the resolution). I consider these changes to be 
> completely editorial and
> 
> do not see the need to go back to the TC to get the TC 
> blessing (the TC will bless it in any case when the next CD 
> is approved).
> 
> I did not upload the PDF as it may not be final (and I don't 
> want to version the PDF -- it is a 'Derived Object') and I'm 
> not sure where to upload it. Currently, the lastest ed drafts 
> (wsrmp wd 02 and wsrm wd 07)
> 
> are under "Calendar Documents". Shouldn't we just create 
> another container for the latest docs?
> 
> Thx!
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]