RE: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to include resolution for issues 22, 24, 54, 73

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

Anish, 

Is that going to be version 5 of the draft? 


--umit
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Monday, Dec 05, 2005 11:02 AM
> To: Marc Goodner
> Cc: WS-RX Editors
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to 
> include resolution for issues 22, 24, 54, 73
> 
> Marc,
> 
> Thanks for looking at the doc and pointing out the missing issue.
> I included the issues that were agreed to on WebConf between 
> Umit, Gil 
> and me (which did not include issue 55).
> 
> I have included issue 55 in the doc. Will upload in the next 
> 2/3 minutes.
> 
> WRT the diffs, OO does not provide any options when exporting to PDF 
> (except for compression related options) or when comparing docs :-(
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Marc Goodner wrote:
> > It looks like you missed applying i055.
> > 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> s.xml#i055
> > "Delete inactivity timeout."
> > 
> > Otherwise from a sanity check perspective this looks good. 
> As you note
> > below the line number flux and the fact that some of the 
> proposals only
> > use line numbers without text descriptions make this hard to review
> > without laying hard copies next to each other. 
> > 
> > Also, I've noticed a lot of weirdness in the diffs. I don't know if
> > these are being generated in OO or Acrobat, either way look for a
> > setting to ignore formatting differences. It really makes a 
> mess with so
> > many lines marked deleted and new that are exactly the same.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Marc g
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:24 PM
> > To: WS-RX Editors
> > Subject: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to include 
> resolution
> > for issues 22, 24, 54, 73
> > 
> > I have updated the wsrmp spec to include the resolution for 
> issues 22, 
> > 24, 54, 73 as agreed today.
> > 
> > The link for the sxw file is:
> > 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
> nload.php/
> > 15709/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-02.sxw
> > 
> > The PDF is attached to this email. The diff with CD01 (PDF) is also 
> > attached.
> > 
> > Please let me know if there is anything missing and I'll fix it. 
> > Anything else needs to be done in WSRMP doc for the F2F?
> > 
> > Please note that for some of the issue resolutions the line 
> numbers did 
> > not match (with the referenced spec in the resolution 
> email) or were 
> > incorrect. But I searched for the right text and made the 
> changes at the
> > 
> > right places. In addition, I had to make changes to the text to 
> > incorporate the resolutions. Specifically, because we 
> deleted backoff 
> > and retransmission params, the example in the spec changed 
> (which was 
> > part of the resolution), which meant that the line numbers in the 
> > example changed (which was not part of the resolution), 
> which meant that
> > 
> > the line numbers referenced in the text changed (which was 
> not part of 
> > the resolution). I consider these changes to be completely 
> editorial and
> > 
> > do not see the need to go back to the TC to get the TC 
> blessing (the TC 
> > will bless it in any case when the next CD is approved).
> > 
> > I did not upload the PDF as it may not be final (and I 
> don't want to 
> > version the PDF -- it is a 'Derived Object') and I'm not 
> sure where to 
> > upload it. Currently, the lastest ed drafts (wsrmp wd 02 
> and wsrm wd 07)
> > 
> > are under "Calendar Documents". Shouldn't we just create another 
> > container for the latest docs?
> > 
> > Thx!
> > 
> > -Anish
> > --
>