From:
Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 12:57
PM
To: Marc Goodner;
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done
with wsrmp docs.
From: Marc
Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, Dec 09, 2005 10:38
AM
To: Yalcinalp, Umit;
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done
with wsrmp docs.
Every time I
send out the issue list update mail I also include the perma url for that
version so I’m surprised by the below comment that it is hard to find. The
format is simply append –nnn to the name of the file for the version you
wish to get to.
From:
Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:21
PM
To:
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with
wsrmp docs.
I fixed the date on the footer
to reflect the current date when the doc was edited.
I found only one issue wrt to
the pending issues. In the editorial nits i072, we were asked to remove the
"." in the appendix sections. I left it as is as it is created due to the
style we use from OASIS. I don't think it is worth to delay sending the
specs to the tc for the present time.
--umit
PS. BTW, Marc where is the
revisions of the issue list? The list does not appear to be updated in the
tc's doc area and only the perma link is provided.
This makes discussing the issue
list harder because revisions do not appear to be updated anymore and we are
only using the permalink. Therefore, I can not reliably say that a version
of the issues list at DateX had Issue Y as pending if I were to look
at the Issues List again on DateZ where there may be additional Issues on
the list, or Issue Y status may be changed.
Could you point us to it?
This is why we urgently need an
editor's to do list!
----------------------
Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
Standards
Architect
NetWeaver Industry
Standards
SAP Labs, LLC
umit.yalcinalp@sap.com
Tel: (650) 320-3095