OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)


Title: OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
 
If we agree that we should all use the same version, then I would say the question boils down to whether we should use 1.1.5 or 2.0.  I'm always in favor of using the latest version as long as it's stable.
 
-Steve
 
 


From: Yalcinalp, Umit
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 13, 2005 14:21 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz; Winkler, Steve; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

I have been using 1.1.4.
 
I care about a stable version that I do not need to chase bugs. If 1.1.5 is stable enough, I see no reason why we should not move to that.
 
--umit
 


From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 13, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Winkler, Steve; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

I think we should all use the same version of OO. There may be no issues with using different versions but using the same version removes one source of potential problems.
 
I don't really care if we use 1.1.5 or if we use 2.0. I'm willing to upgrade to 2.0 if/when the other editors so the same. Its not like I have to pay for an upgrade license or anything . . .
 
- g


From: Winkler, Steve [mailto:steve.winkler@sap.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:40 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)


Hi editors,

I made a detailed pass over the document this weekend to fix up editorial issues.  I tried to limit myself explicitly to issues I deemed editorial, and will send around a red line doc showing the diffs so that the editors can agree to the changes before I submit them. 

The point of this mail is that when I tried to do the diff to send it out right now, I was unable to do so effectively because I apparently have a newer version of Open Office installed than the rest of you. OO 2.0 [1] was released in October, and I was curious what the editors thought about upgrading to the newly released version. 

In the meantime, I'm currently installing the 1.1.5 version that Gil mentioned he is using so that I can produce the aforementioned diff. 

This is just a general pulse check: What versions are editors using now, and what do the editors think about upgrading to the 2.0 version of Open Office?

Cheers,
Steve 

[1] http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]