[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 13, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Winkler, Steve; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)I think we should all use the same version of OO. There may be no issues with using different versions but using the same version removes one source of potential problems.I don't really care if we use 1.1.5 or if we use 2.0. I'm willing to upgrade to 2.0 if/when the other editors so the same. Its not like I have to pay for an upgrade license or anything . . .- g
From: Winkler, Steve [mailto:steve.winkler@sap.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:40 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
Hi editors,
I made a detailed pass over the document this weekend to fix up editorial issues. I tried to limit myself explicitly to issues I deemed editorial, and will send around a red line doc showing the diffs so that the editors can agree to the changes before I submit them.
The point of this mail is that when I tried to do the diff to send it out right now, I was unable to do so effectively because I apparently have a newer version of Open Office installed than the rest of you. OO 2.0 [1] was released in October, and I was curious what the editors thought about upgrading to the newly released version.
In the meantime, I'm currently installing the 1.1.5 version that Gil mentioned he is using so that I can produce the aforementioned diff.
This is just a general pulse check: What versions are editors using now, and what do the editors think about upgrading to the 2.0 version of Open Office?
Cheers,
Steve
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]