RE: [ws-rx-editors] References vs. bookmarks? OO question

["Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@sap.com>]

I think OO 2.0 is much better.  Is there any reason why we wouldn't
switch now? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Thursday, Dec 22, 2005 19:12 PM
To: Yalcinalp, Umit
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] References vs. bookmarks? OO question

I don't know the bookmarks that you are talking about, but I remember 
that Gil was pointing out that mailto URIs don't show up correctly in
PDF.

I generated the PDF using OOo 2.0 and the mailto URIs work correctly in 
the generated PDF (didn't even have to change the .sxw format). I also 
checked that with OOo 2.0, the reference points to the correct relative 
URI reference (#whatever) for the correct reference entry.

I'm quite happy with OOo 2.0, so far.

-Anish
--

Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> This is an OO question. I recall that Gil was complaining that the 
> references to the "References" in the specs were not preserved when
PDF 
> is created.
> 
> I noticed the way that refs are created are via using bookmarks in OO,

> not inserting reference fields/reference values. Does anyone know why 
> this is done via bookmarks, but not actual references?
> 
> It may be a mute point for PDF as neither of the formats work to get 
> hyperlinks from pdf, either.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --umit
> 
>