Re: [ws-rx-editors] References vs. bookmarks? OO question

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

+1

-Anish
--

Winkler, Steve wrote:
> I think OO 2.0 is much better.  Is there any reason why we wouldn't
> switch now? 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, Dec 22, 2005 19:12 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] References vs. bookmarks? OO question
> 
> I don't know the bookmarks that you are talking about, but I remember 
> that Gil was pointing out that mailto URIs don't show up correctly in
> PDF.
> 
> I generated the PDF using OOo 2.0 and the mailto URIs work correctly in 
> the generated PDF (didn't even have to change the .sxw format). I also 
> checked that with OOo 2.0, the reference points to the correct relative 
> URI reference (#whatever) for the correct reference entry.
> 
> I'm quite happy with OOo 2.0, so far.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> 
>>Folks,
>>
>>This is an OO question. I recall that Gil was complaining that the 
>>references to the "References" in the specs were not preserved when
> 
> PDF 
> 
>>is created.
>>
>>I noticed the way that refs are created are via using bookmarks in OO,
> 
> 
>>not inserting reference fields/reference values. Does anyone know why 
>>this is done via bookmarks, but not actual references?
>>
>>It may be a mute point for PDF as neither of the formats work to get 
>>hyperlinks from pdf, either.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>--umit
>>
>>