RE: [ws-rx-editors] when are we going to switch to OO 2.0

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, Dec 22, 2005 6:26 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc: Gilbert Pilz; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] when are we going to switch to OO 2.0
> 
> I thought we were going to do this for wsrm wd8 and wsrmp 
> wd3. I.e. the 
> next drafts. I deinstalled my previous version of OO and 
> installed 2.0. 
> I guess I'll have to reinstall 00 1.x again, since I saw new versions 
> checked in which have the .sxw format.

Hmm. I was not aware that we were switching "before" touching
wsrm08/wsrmp03. 

I checked in a new version of wsrm08 yesterday using the old version of
OO. 

Could you check whether there is any anomalies in the version? 

I have not switched to the new version and when I was making the
updates, there was no issues, except for one formatting error with
Steve's name and email address, which I fixed. 

> 
> -Anish
> --

Thanks, 

--umit

> 
> 
> Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> > I think we should first get the next drafts and do this 
> revision for 
> > both of the specs. The deadline for incorporating the 
> changes is Jan 
> > 5th. I suggest we do this after we present the wd to the TC 
> in case we 
> > need to deal with the issues in OO 2.0, not before.
> >  
> >  
> > --umit
> >  
> > 
> >     
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >     *From:* Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, Dec 22, 2005 12:21 PM
> >     *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> >     *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] when are we going to switch to OO 2.0
> > 
> >     At the F2F we agreed to switch to OO 2.0. The trick is 
> we all have
> >     to do it more or less in sync. That is, once somebody 
> saves one of
> >     our artifacts with OO 2.0 and checks it in, nobody else 
> should ever
> >     edit that artifact any version of OO that is less than 2.0.
> >      
> >     So when are we going to upgrade?
> >      
> >     - g
>