OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Scope of namespace change policy (was RE: [ws-rx-editors] WDs for 1/5)



I remember it coming up, but I don't remember the resolution. I tend to
agree with you that we shouldn't worry about namespace changes for
committee drafts though.

-Steve 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com] 
Sent: Thursday, Jan 05, 2006 11:19 AM
To: Anish Karmarkar; Marc Goodner
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] Scope of namespace change policy (was RE:
[ws-rx-editors] WDs for 1/5)

I don't remember the subject of the scope of the namespace change policy
ever coming up. I had assumed that it applied only to approved Committee
Specifications and OASIS Standards. I can see the case for applying it
to Committee Drafts but I would really have to push back against the
idea of applying it to Working Drafts. It just makes more work for the
editors and working drafts never make any kind of "real" promises to
implementers in the first place (that's why we have working drafts. I
invite the chairs to comment . . .

- g  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:36 AM
> To: Marc Goodner
> Cc: Gilbert Pilz; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] WDs for 1/5
> 
> Marc,
> 
> Some time back Chris/Paul had taken an action to propose a 
> namespace change policy [1]. Which I *think* was something 
> along the lines of: 
> change the NS only if there is a backward incompatible change.
> But this applies only to Committee specs.
> 
> I don't recall, if the TC accepted the proposal or not.
> 
> Were there any incompatible changes made? Offhand, I can't 
> think of any.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> [1]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archi
> ves/200509/msg00189.html
> 
> Marc Goodner wrote:
> > Shouldn't the namespace be updated?
> > 
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > 
> > *From:* Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:13 PM
> > *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> > *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] WDs for 1/5
> > *Importance:* High
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Attached are the PDF's for wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-08 and 
> wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-03. 
> > Please give them a look over. If I don't hear from anyone 
> before noon 
> > tomorrow I will publish them to the main TC pages at that 
> time. Sorry 
> > for the short review period, but we effectively promised 
> the TC they 
> > would have something to review by the middle of this week.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > - g
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]