Re: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

I don't think we should worry about it for cd-02 either.

But the previous/initial version of the xsd (both wsrm and wsrmp) did 
not have tabs, only the WSDL had tabs. Whoever edited it last (it might 
be you Gil, not sure), might want to turn off tab/formating to whatever 
editor they are using (eg, for vi/vim: set ts=2; set expandtab;  set 
sw=2; etc).

But I agree with Doug that s/^I/  /g would be best. Should I go ahead 
and do that for the .xsd and .wsdl files (in the editors SC doc folder)?

I noticed that we are not creating a new document (with a file name that 
has the WD version number in it) for .xsd and .wsdl files like we do for 
the .odt files. The file name only contains the namespace identifier 
'200510'. Does anybody feel that we should name the files something 
along the lines:
wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wdXX.xsd.

-Anish
--

Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> The tab problem was something I noticed towards the end of the process. 
> We can take a stab at fixing it in the next WDs but I don't think we 
> should worry about it for cd-02.
>  
> - g
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:49 AM
>     *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>     *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> 
> 
>     Do we have any control over the size of the tabs in the imported
>     schema/xml?  They appear to be 8 spaces instead of 2 (like the rest
>     of the spec) - do we have any control over that? I would imagine
>     that no tabs at all would be best.
>     -Doug