RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

Splitting of wsdl and schema files is primarily for the editors'
convenience. So essentially whatever works for the editors team to keep
track of these artifacts is good enough. Gil's suggestion below to use
only the latest version and not worry about revving up for each wd seems
fine to me.

As far as the publicly visible versions are concerned (CD and CS), we
should bring the version numbers on all the related artifacts in synch.
Thoughts?

Thanks, sanjay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 12:09 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay; Anish Karmarkar
> Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> 
> Splitting out the schema and wsdl files caused a problem that 
> we should
> have forseen; since the files are now separate artifacts they 
> can change
> independently of one another. For example, suppose we had
> wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.odt that included 
> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl to
> make wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf. Now we make some changes to
> wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.odt and are preparing to publish it as
> wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.pdf. The WSDL file hasn't changed so do we include
> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl or do we create a
> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-11.wsdl (which is exactly the same as 
> the previous
> version) or what? It seems counter-intuitive to me to create a new
> version of an artifact that is exactly the same as the 
> previous version
> solely for the purpose of trackig another artifact.
> 
> I was thinking that, since schema and WSDL file changes are rare, we
> should just let Kavi take care of all the versions of
> wsrm*-1.1-*-200510.* and always include "the latest version" when we
> generate PDF's for public consumption.
> 
> - g
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:14 AM
> > To: Anish Karmarkar; Gilbert Pilz
> > Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> > 
> > > Does anybody feel that we should name the files something 
> along the 
> > > lines:
> > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wdXX.xsd.
> > 
> > As per the resolution of issue i074 [1], the TC accepted to 
> > name the final wsdl and xsd files as wsrm-1.1.wsdl and 
> > wsrm-1.1.xsd respectively.
> > I understand that this is not helpful for naming the wsdl and 
> > xsd files for WDs and CDs. How about including the 
> > <status>-<revision> just before the file extension? For 
> > example, the CD II wsdl file would be named - wsrm-1.1-cd-02.wsdl
> > 
> > 
> > [1]
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > s.xml#i074
> > 
>