RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

That reminds me of a possible agenda item for this week's call - discuss
document policy. Are the editors prepared to present and discuss the
process/policy you are following. Who is planning to take the lead?

Thanks,
Sanjay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yalcinalp, Umit 
> Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 13:36 PM
> To: Gilbert Pilz; Patil, Sanjay; Anish Karmarkar
> Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> 
> Sounds like another note for your process document, Gil.
> 
> +1 to use the latest version and please DO document this. 
> 
> --umit
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 12:09 PM
> > To: Patil, Sanjay; Anish Karmarkar
> > Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> > 
> > Splitting out the schema and wsdl files caused a problem that 
> > we should
> > have forseen; since the files are now separate artifacts they 
> > can change
> > independently of one another. For example, suppose we had
> > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.odt that included 
> > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl to
> > make wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf. Now we make some changes to
> > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.odt and are preparing to publish it as
> > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-11.pdf. The WSDL file hasn't changed so do 
> we include
> > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wd-10.wsdl or do we create a
> > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-11.wsdl (which is exactly the same as 
> > the previous
> > version) or what? It seems counter-intuitive to me to create a new
> > version of an artifact that is exactly the same as the 
> > previous version
> > solely for the purpose of trackig another artifact.
> > 
> > I was thinking that, since schema and WSDL file changes are rare, we
> > should just let Kavi take care of all the versions of
> > wsrm*-1.1-*-200510.* and always include "the latest version" when we
> > generate PDF's for public consumption.
> > 
> > - g
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:14 AM
> > > To: Anish Karmarkar; Gilbert Pilz
> > > Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] tabs in xml
> > > 
> > > > Does anybody feel that we should name the files something 
> > along the 
> > > > lines:
> > > > wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-wdXX.xsd.
> > > 
> > > As per the resolution of issue i074 [1], the TC accepted to 
> > > name the final wsdl and xsd files as wsrm-1.1.wsdl and 
> > > wsrm-1.1.xsd respectively.
> > > I understand that this is not helpful for naming the wsdl and 
> > > xsd files for WDs and CDs. How about including the 
> > > <status>-<revision> just before the file extension? For 
> > > example, the CD II wsdl file would be named - wsrm-1.1-cd-02.wsdl
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1]
> > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue
> > > s.xml#i074
> > > 
> > 
>