RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

OK - this time I double-checked and
these are now in wd10.
Dunno about the filename/schema discussion.
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

01/23/2006 01:19 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts

I’m not going to vote against
the CD over this but some of these changes were not made.

• Section 2.4, first paragraph after bullets, line 247: “Should the acknowledgement…” should be “Should an acknowledgement…”
• Section 3.1: “Note, offering…” this sounds like it is trying to make the following text non-normative. Suggest changing to “Note that offering…” to prevent that interpretation.
• Section 5: WS-Trust missing a reference (would be non-normative as WS-SecureConversation is).
• Section 6: SecureConversation date is wrong, it should be February 2005

Also, do we have a decision
recorded regarding updating the file names of the schema and wsdl to match
the proper artifact identifiers?
 
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:04 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts
 

I've made these fixes to wd09/wd04 - but I didn't do the schema/wsdl mods.
 Mainly because I ran out of time - perhaps someone else could take
'em before the call tomorrow???
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

01/10/2006 12:37 PM

To	<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts

 

One other thing, the URI reference in WS-RM Policy needs to be updated to match WS-RM. In WD 03 it still points to 2396 instead of 3986.
 

 

---

From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:51 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Comments on latest working drafts
  
I think all of my comments below are editorial. I hope these can be addressed
for the documents that go up for the CD ballot. Many thanks to the editors
for getting these done over the holidays.
  
Both documents 
Copyright needs to be updated to 2006 in OASIS boilerplate and footers
Namespace should be updated (I’ll start a separate thread on this)
Schema and WSDL

• Shouldn’t both of these have OASIS boilerplate in comments?
• File name seems wrong, why is the date part of the name? I think the form is product-productVersion-artifactType-stage-revision which would give us wsrm-1.1-schema-wd-08.xsd as and example. Personally given the file extension gives the type I think we shouldn’t use it in the file name, it makes more sense for a spec which has multiple extension types used (i.e. .pdf, .html, etc.).
• The files aren’t available at the location specified.

WS-RM Policy WD 03 
Looks good other than the above.
  
WS-RM WD 08 
Line numbers from the diff bar version
Section 2.4, first paragraph after bullets, line 247: “Should the acknowledgement…”
should be “Should an acknowledgement…”
Section 3.1, line 274: “Note, offering…” this sounds like it is trying
to make the following text non-normative. Suggest changing to “Note that
offering…” to prevent that interpretation.
Section 5, line 814: WS-Trust missing a reference (would be non-normative
as WS-SecureConversation is).
Section 6, line 893: URI date is wrong, it should be January 2005
Section 6, line 926: SecureConversation date is wrong, it should be February
2005 
  
  
Marc Goodner 
Technical Diplomat 
Microsoft Corporation 
Tel: (425) 703-1903 
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/