ws-rx-editors message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: i086
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:07:14 -0500
Silly question but for i086 do anyone
have an opinion on what the pseudo schema would look like?
<wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement
...>
<wsrm:Identifier
...> xs:anyURI </wsrm:Identifier>
[ [ <wsrm:AcknowledgementRange
...
Upper="xs:unsignedLong"
Lower="xs:unsignedLong"/> +
| <wsrm:None/>
]
<wsrm:Final/>
?
| <wsrm:Nack>
xs:unsignedLong </wsrm:Nack> + ]
...
</wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement>
Do we keep the unsignedLong's and just
talk about the max # in the text? tried to find some other example
to base it on but didn't find one.
I did change the actual schema for each
occurrence to
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedLong">
<xs:minInclusive value="1"/>
<xs:maxInclusive value="9223372036854775807"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
per Anish's ammedment but the other
(textual) references to "unsigned long" aren't as obvious to
me. Any suggestions?
-Doug
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]