Re: [ws-rx-editors] WSRM WD 10 and WSRMP WD 06 and related documentsuploaded (candidates for CD 3)

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

I missed mentioning one more change that I made:
Per Dug's suggestion [1], I sorted the editor's list by lastname.

-Anish
--

[1] 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/email/archives/200601/msg00010.html

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> All,
> 
> The following documents are uploaded and ready for review. If I had 
> connectivity earlier I would have uploaded them earlier. Please review 
> them ASAP, if you can, and send an email to the editors list. I'll send 
> an email to the TC about these docs tomorrow (since we promised the TC 
> that we would deliver by friday). If you find errors/issues later they 
> can be fixed with other issues that the TC members may find.
> 
> Doc list:
> 
> 1) WSRM WD-10 ODT format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16752/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.odt 
> 
> 
> 2) WSRM WD-10 PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16754/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf 
> 
> 
> 3) WSRM WD-09/WD-10 Diff PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16756/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-09-10-diff.pdf 
> 
> 
> 4) WSRMP WD-06 ODT format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16751/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-06.odt 
> 
> 
> 5) WSRMP WD-06 PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16753/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-06.pdf 
> 
> 
> 6) WSRMP WD-05/WD-06 Diff PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16755/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-05-06-diff.pdf 
> 
> 
> 7) WSRM Schema 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16741/wsrm-1.1-schema-200602.xsd 
> 
> 
> 8) WSRM Schema 200510/200602 Diff (diff -w):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16748/wsrm-1.1-schema-200510-200602.dif 
> 
> 
> 9) WSRM WSDL 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16742/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200602.wsdl 
> 
> 
> 10) WSRM WSDL 200510/200602 Diff (diff -w):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16749/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-200602.dif 
> 
> 
> 11) WSRMP Schema 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16743/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200602.xsd 
> 
> 
> 12) WSRMP Schema 200510/200602 Diff (diff -2):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/16750/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200510-200602.dif 
> 
> 
> 
> Details of changes that I made:
> 
> 1) ***** Changes not authorized by the TC *****
> (I'll send an email to the TC pointing these changes and ask the TC to 
> ratify these changes on the next call. If there are objections from 
> member, I'll of course pull them out)
> a) In the resolution of issue i078, the WSDL changes that were approved 
> made TerminateSequence and TerminateSequenceResponse two separate 
> operations. Clearly, they are meant to be a single operation similar to 
> CloseSequence/CloseSequenceResponse. Mea culpa on this one. The proposal 
> that the TC approved came from me. Sorry about that.
> b) I fixed a problem with proposal for issue i087. The attribute 
> extensibility was missing from the description, but was present in the 
> pseudo-schema (with a malformed syntax). Since the other text in the 
> proposal essentially said migrate the element from WSRMP spec to WSRM 
> and the element in WSRMP spec had the attribute extensibility, I added 
> it to the spec.
> 
> 2) WSRM Schema
> a) included MessageNumberType (issue 86)
> b) replace all tabs with 2 spaces
> c) added changes for issue 85 (closesequence identifier)
> d) added changes for issue 95 (closesequeceResponse identifier)
> e) resolution of 87 as it applies to wsrm schema
> f) resolution of 94 (new fault added)
> g) also added the fault code wsrm:SequenceClosed (this was a mismatch 
> between the existing spec and schema) ***** this was not part of any new 
> issue resolution *****
> h) Namespace change
> 
> 3) WSRMP schema
> a) resolution of 87
> b) replace all tabs with 2 spaces
> c) namespace change
> 
> 4) WSDL
> a) include TerminateSequenceResponse.
> b) namespace change
> 
> 5) WSRM spec
> a) removed spurious 'xxx' at the end of section 3.3
> b) resolution of 87 as it applies to WSRM spec
> c) namespace change
> 
> 6) WSRMP spec
> a) removed the sentence -- "The RM assertion parameters do not affect 
> the messages which are sent on the wire." in section 2.1 (part of 
> resolution of issue i086). There aren't any RM Assertion parameters 
> anymore.
> 
> 7) I also verified that the resolution for issues: 75, 78, 82, 83, 85, 
> 86, 87, 94, 95 were correctly incorporated -- thanks to Dug.
> 
> 8) Issue 88 does not affect the WSRM/WSRMP specs or the schemas/wsdl -- 
> it is a NS version policy adopted by the TC. It may affect the RDDL doc, 
> but not sure.
> 
> 9) I did not incorporate resolution of issue 83 (requires going through 
> the whole spec and changing text around possibly every RFC 2119 
> keywords). I believe (and so does Dug) that this is the only issue that 
> is not incorporated into the text that we were supposed to. This is 
> mostly an editorial issue and will not affect the interops. I suggest 
> that we incorporate this issue in the next draft.
> 
> -Anish
> --