[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] next CD? (or how to translate a member-only doc URL to a public doc URL)
Ah, now I understand. I still think it would be good if we could use public links to the drafts going forward so I stick by my comment that we should point this out to the full TC and ask that they use the proper link format. On the CD2 point specifically, I think that the current CD2 link is tagged as "candidate" so I didn't want to use that one. I though our TC administrator was going to put the CD at the proper location which was why there isn't a just CD02 link in Kavi other than the candidate link. So that was the link I was waiting for. I guess I know what it's going to be so I could do an optimistic update. Marc Goodner Technical Diplomat Microsoft Corporation Tel: (425) 703-1903 Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ -----Original Message----- From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 4:50 PM To: Marc Goodner Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Patil, Sanjay; Paul Fremantle Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD? (or how to translate a member-only doc URL to a public doc URL) Marc, I did not mean to imply that you (or anyone) should scrub the current issues list of member-only links. I thought you were waiting for the CD 2 draft to be public and I was merely point out (and sharing my experience with KAVI public/member-only URL behavior) that it already was public, given the weirdness of KAVI. -Anish -- Marc Goodner wrote: > Anish, > > I have been using the public urls for the mail links for a long time. It > is rare I mess that up anymore. The doc ones, honestly I use whatever > I'm given. > > Can the chair this week please ask the TC to use the public links when > referring to TC docs from now on to help in this? It would be good to > capture Anish's notes below on this in the minutes to aid the members in > following through with this. > > I'm not going to go through the issue list and scrub out member only > links, there just isn't any return on the investment of that time. If > someone else wants to, have at it. Just let me know when you are going > to do it so we don't step on each other's edits. > > I'm editing the issue list right now. I expect it will get updated > today. > > It would be much better if the staff would fix Kavi. I can't even begin > to comment on how stupid it is to have a protected link that is also > public that just introduces problems rather than solving any. See the > above and the TC Process document for more details on how asinine Kavi's > behavior in this regard is. > > Marc Goodner > Technical Diplomat > Microsoft Corporation > Tel: (425) 703-1903 > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 4:12 PM > To: Marc Goodner > Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Patil, Sanjay; Paul > Fremantle > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD? (or how to translate a member-only > doc URL to a public doc URL) > > Marc, > > I have noticed that like the email archive, every document in KAVI (at > least in WSRX) has a member-only URL and a public URL. > > The member only URLs are typically: > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/<some-nu > meric-id>/<doc-name> > > The public URLs are typically: > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/<some-numeric-id>/<doc > -name> > > If you see a member-only URL for a doc you can translate the URL to a > public URL be using the appropriate prefix (replace > "apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx" with "committees" in the URL) > > For example the member-only CD2 URLs are: > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16271/ws > rm-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16273/ws > rmp-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf > > The equivalent public URLs are: > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd > -02.pdf > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16273/wsrmp-1.1-spec-c > d-02.pdf > > In fact the only important thing is the <some-numeric-id> everything > else is irrelevant. > > The URLs: > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd > -02.pdf > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/complete-garbage > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/really-important > > all return the same document. > > Not sure if you are waiting for public URLs for updating the issues > list, but thought I would mention. All of this doesn't help if things > need to happen on http://docs.oasis-open.org. > > -Anish > -- > > Marc Goodner wrote: > >>Also, it isn't our fault (that I can tell) but it sure would be nice > > if > >>the CD2 could get posted before we get to CD3. How long have we been >>waiting on an answer now on that? Are we going to get to PR before any > > >>of our approved CDs get posted? Honestly I've been sitting on a bunch > > of > >>the "done" issues that need to be changed to "closed" so that I can > > add > >>a remark pointing to the CD2 doc that closes them. This is really >>starting to hurt. >> >> >> >>Sanjay or Paul, have you guys heard anything yet? >> >> >> >>Marc Goodner >> >>Technical Diplomat >> >>Microsoft Corporation >> >>Tel: (425) 703-1903 >> >>Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>*From:* Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] >>*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:32 PM >>*To:* Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >>*Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] next CD? >> >> >> >>I have plans to review today, at least as a first pass. I expect I'll >>get though a deeper review at the latest tomorrow afternoon. >> >> >> >>Was a CD3 candidate asked for by the TC? Seems premature if not, I >>suggest bringing this up on Thursday's call and being ready to post it > > >>afterwards. Not that I'm opposed, I'm actually inclined to think we >>should do a CD before the F2F. >> >> >> >>Marc Goodner >> >>Technical Diplomat >> >>Microsoft Corporation >> >>Tel: (425) 703-1903 >> >>Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>*From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] >>*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:13 PM >>*To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >>*Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] next CD? >> >> >> >> >>All, >> I just did a quick scan of the diffs between the last CD and the WDs > > >>we have available. I found two minor typos in the core spec but > > nothing > >>serious enough to regen everything. Has anyone else looked at 'em >>(aside from Anish) - I'd like to post 'em to the TC today as candidate > > >>CD 3. >>thanks >>-Doug >> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]