ws-rx-editors message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:40:35 -0500
I thought this was gonna be CD3 - but
maybe that was just wishful thinking - I really thought Paul had said we
should make it available by last Friday so people could review it ASAP
as cd3 - oh well, guess we're not in that big of a rush.
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
02/20/2006 08:35 PM
|
To
| Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
|
cc
| Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [ws-rx-editors] next
CD? |
|
Marc Goodner wrote:
> I looked through the minutes and didn't see any record of it. I thought
> I remembered that to but two RX meetings per day breaks my brain on
> where what was said.
>
I was basing that on email exchanges that I had with Dug last week.
Ok, so we should not consider this to be a candidate for CD3 (at least
not till the TC agrees).
> I can't wait until we stop that BTW, 2.5 hours per week (just on calls
> mind you, and all on the same day) for a TC with just 5 open issues
is
> just madness. Madness I tell you!
>
I empathize with you.
Although, I don't attend both the WSRX calls, I still sometimes can't
keep things straight in my brain about what happened in which TC/WG.
Kudos to Tom for taking great minutes (and volunteering for it!!).
-Anish
--
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:45 PM
> To: Marc Goodner
> Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
>
> Marc Goodner wrote:
>
>>I have plans to review today, at least as a first pass. I expect
I'll
>>get though a deeper review at the latest tomorrow afternoon.
>>
>>
>>
>>Was a CD3 candidate asked for by the TC? Seems premature if not,
I
>>suggest bringing this up on Thursday's call and being ready to
post it
>
>
>>afterwards. Not that I'm opposed, I'm actually inclined to think
we
>>should do a CD before the F2F.
>>
>
>
> I could be wrong but I thought the TC decided that there was going
to be
>
> CD 3 before the F2F.
> (haven't trolled thru the minutes to figure this out)
>
> -Anish
> --
>
>
>>
>>
>>Marc Goodner
>>
>>Technical Diplomat
>>
>>Microsoft Corporation
>>
>>Tel: (425) 703-1903
>>
>>Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>*From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
>>*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:13 PM
>>*To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>>*Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>All,
>> I just did a quick scan of the diffs between the last CD
and the WDs
>
>
>>we have available. I found two minor typos in the core spec
but
>
> nothing
>
>>serious enough to regen everything. Has anyone else looked
at 'em
>>(aside from Anish) - I'd like to post 'em to the TC today as candidate
>
>
>>CD 3.
>>thanks
>>-Doug
>>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]