All I’m saying is
the record doesn’t reflect that. It may have been said, I don’t
recall and it isn’t recorded. I’m not opposed to moving quickly to
get to CD3. Something tells me these last issues are going to take a little
while (regret filing i061 yet Doug? ;-)) and are unlikely to close in time to
make it into any CD before the F2F. So I’m fine with moving quickly if we
can.
And yes I’ve
been to busy to review the docs before 5 today… I’ll do my best to
get comments in ASAP but I’m not going to ask anyone to hold up anything
on my account.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006
5:41 PM
To:
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next
CD?
I thought this was gonna be CD3 - but maybe that was
just wishful thinking - I really thought Paul had said we should make it
available by last Friday so people could review it ASAP as cd3 - oh well, guess
we're not in that big of a rush.
-Doug
|
Anish Karmarkar
<Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
02/20/2006 08:35 PM
|
|
To
|
Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
|
|
cc
|
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
|
|
Marc
Goodner wrote:
> I looked through the minutes and didn't see
any record of it. I thought
> I remembered that to but two RX meetings per
day breaks my brain on
> where what was said.
>
I was basing that on email exchanges that I had
with Dug last week.
Ok, so we should not consider this to be a
candidate for CD3 (at least
not till the TC agrees).
> I can't wait until we stop that BTW, 2.5
hours per week (just on calls
> mind you, and all on the same day) for a TC
with just 5 open issues is
> just madness. Madness I tell you!
>
I empathize with you.
Although, I don't attend both the WSRX calls, I
still sometimes can't
keep things straight in my brain about what
happened in which TC/WG.
Kudos to Tom for taking great minutes (and
volunteering for it!!).
-Anish
--
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar
[mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:45 PM
> To: Marc Goodner
> Cc: Doug Davis;
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
>
> Marc Goodner wrote:
>
>>I have plans to review today, at least as
a first pass. I expect I'll
>>get though a deeper review at the latest tomorrow
afternoon.
>>
>>
>>
>>Was a CD3 candidate asked for by the TC?
Seems premature if not, I
>>suggest bringing this up on Thursday's
call and being ready to post it
>
>
>>afterwards. Not that I'm opposed, I'm
actually inclined to think we
>>should do a CD before the F2F.
>>
>
>
> I could be wrong but I thought the TC decided
that there was going to be
>
> CD 3 before the F2F.
> (haven't trolled thru the minutes to figure
this out)
>
> -Anish
> --
>
>
>>
>>
>>Marc Goodner
>>
>>Technical Diplomat
>>
>>Microsoft Corporation
>>
>>Tel: (425) 703-1903
>>
>>Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>*From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
>>*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:13 PM
>>*To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>>*Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>All,
>> I just did a quick scan of the
diffs between the last CD and the WDs
>
>
>>we have available. I found two minor
typos in the core spec but
>
> nothing
>
>>serious enough to regen everything.
Has anyone else looked at 'em
>>(aside from Anish) - I'd like to post 'em
to the TC today as candidate
>
>
>>CD 3.
>>thanks
>>-Doug
>>