RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

Mary, you imply that OASIS does now have some approved accepted policy
regarding things like keywords and products. I don't think that is
correct. If there is an approved policy that covers this pleas provide a
reference to it.

Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ 


-----Original Message-----
From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:05 AM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James Bryce Clark
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts


Hi Mary,

The use of the date identifier in the URI is a deliberate decision the
WS-RX TC made after sweating over a lot of discussions. Please note that
the product version identifiers are part of the artifact names (last
token in the URI) in our scheme .

So I must say that currently we do not much choice and would strongly
prefer to keep the format of the URI as suggested in Gil's original
email. 

--Sanjay
WS-RX TC Co-Chair

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2006 7:23 AM
> To: 'Gilbert Pilz'
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'
> Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> 
> Hi Gilbert,
> 
>   My apologies for the delay in responding; I've been trying 
> to research the decision regarding the WS-RX TC's use of the keyword
> WSRM. It appears that since we did not have an explicit 
> policy in place reserving the keyword for use only by the 
> WSRM TC, and since
> the WSRM TC does not call its work product "wsrm", that WS-RX 
> is being allowed to use the WSRM as a product designation. There's one
> other problem however,and that's the use of a date identifier 
> rather than a version number - The OASIS Library is configured to
> identify TC work products by version number (i.e. 
> docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/). Is it possible for the 
> editors to
> reconfigure the documents to match that scheme? 
> 
>   Thanks,
> 
> Mary 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:58 AM
> > To: Mary McRae
> > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover
> > Subject: RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > 
> > Mary,
> > 
> > Any word on the review of the WS-RX CD-02 artifacts? The rest 
> > of the TC is going to want status from me on Thursday so I 
> > need to know what to tell them.
> > 
> > - gp 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Robin Cover [mailto:robin@oasis-open.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:04 PM
> > > To: Gilbert Pilz
> > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary McRae
> > > Subject: Re: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Robin,
> > > >  
> > > > Attached is a zip archive containing the artifacts that 
> > make up the 
> > > > WX-RX TC's Committee Draft 02. The archive structure is
> > > intended for
> > > > unpacking under http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx. You will
> > > notice that
> > > > we have included the RDDL documents 
> > > > "wsrm/200510/wsrm-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html" and 
> > > > "wsrmp/200510/wsrmp-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html". In order for
> > > things to work
> > > > as intended these files need to be the default page for 
> > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510/"; and 
> > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510/"; respectively.
> > > > 
> > > > Please let me know if any of the above is unclear or there is a 
> > > > problem with organizing the web space in this way.
> > > > 
> > > > Gilbert Pilz
> > > 
> > > Hi Gilbert,
> > > 
> > > I'm forwarding your request to Mary McRae, currently listed 
> > as one of 
> > > the OASIS Staff Contacts for the WS-RX TC, and responsible 
> > for the QA 
> > > work on approved specs as delegated to the OASIS TC Admin.
> > > 
> > > I'm pleased that your TC has decided to use RDDL documents: 
> > > it makes a lot of sense to me.
> > > 
> > > Congratulations on TC progress resulting in these 
> approved CD specs.
> > > 
> > > Robin Cover
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
>