RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts

[Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>]

Hi Mark,

  I was actually trying to say that OASIS does *not* have an explicit policy regarding the reserved use of keywords. I don't believe
the issue had ever arisen in the past; staff has submitted this as an issue to the Board TC Process Committee.

Regards,

Mary 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:21 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James Bryce Clark
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> 
> Mary, you imply that OASIS does now have some approved 
> accepted policy regarding things like keywords and products. 
> I don't think that is correct. If there is an approved policy 
> that covers this pleas provide a reference to it.
> 
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/ 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:05 AM
> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James Bryce Clark
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> 
> 
> Hi Mary,
> 
> The use of the date identifier in the URI is a deliberate decision the
> WS-RX TC made after sweating over a lot of discussions. 
> Please note that
> the product version identifiers are part of the artifact names (last
> token in the URI) in our scheme .
> 
> So I must say that currently we do not much choice and would strongly
> prefer to keep the format of the URI as suggested in Gil's original
> email. 
> 
> --Sanjay
> WS-RX TC Co-Chair
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2006 7:23 AM
> > To: 'Gilbert Pilz'
> > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'
> > Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > 
> > Hi Gilbert,
> > 
> >   My apologies for the delay in responding; I've been trying 
> > to research the decision regarding the WS-RX TC's use of the keyword
> > WSRM. It appears that since we did not have an explicit 
> > policy in place reserving the keyword for use only by the 
> > WSRM TC, and since
> > the WSRM TC does not call its work product "wsrm", that WS-RX 
> > is being allowed to use the WSRM as a product designation. 
> There's one
> > other problem however,and that's the use of a date identifier 
> > rather than a version number - The OASIS Library is configured to
> > identify TC work products by version number (i.e. 
> > docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/). Is it possible for the 
> > editors to
> > reconfigure the documents to match that scheme? 
> > 
> >   Thanks,
> > 
> > Mary 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com] 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:58 AM
> > > To: Mary McRae
> > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover
> > > Subject: RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > 
> > > Mary,
> > > 
> > > Any word on the review of the WS-RX CD-02 artifacts? The rest 
> > > of the TC is going to want status from me on Thursday so I 
> > > need to know what to tell them.
> > > 
> > > - gp 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Robin Cover [mailto:robin@oasis-open.org]
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:04 PM
> > > > To: Gilbert Pilz
> > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary McRae
> > > > Subject: Re: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Robin,
> > > > >  
> > > > > Attached is a zip archive containing the artifacts that 
> > > make up the 
> > > > > WX-RX TC's Committee Draft 02. The archive structure is
> > > > intended for
> > > > > unpacking under http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx. You will
> > > > notice that
> > > > > we have included the RDDL documents 
> > > > > "wsrm/200510/wsrm-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html" and 
> > > > > "wsrmp/200510/wsrmp-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html". In order for
> > > > things to work
> > > > > as intended these files need to be the default page for 
> > > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510/"; and 
> > > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510/"; respectively.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please let me know if any of the above is unclear or 
> there is a 
> > > > > problem with organizing the web space in this way.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Gilbert Pilz
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Gilbert,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm forwarding your request to Mary McRae, currently listed 
> > > as one of 
> > > > the OASIS Staff Contacts for the WS-RX TC, and responsible 
> > > for the QA 
> > > > work on approved specs as delegated to the OASIS TC Admin.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm pleased that your TC has decided to use RDDL documents: 
> > > > it makes a lot of sense to me.
> > > > 
> > > > Congratulations on TC progress resulting in these 
> > approved CD specs.
> > > > 
> > > > Robin Cover
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> >