RE: [ws-rx] WSRM WD 10 and WSRMP WD 06 and related documents uploaded (candidatesfor CD 3)

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

This is the same problem I noticed (and
complained about) in an earlier email.  I think the latest OO is even
worse than the previous one - but at least the old one didn't screw up
this badly.  Is there anyway to go back?
-Doug

"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>

02/22/2006 01:31 PM

To	"Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>, Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	"wsrx" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	RE: [ws-rx] WSRM WD 10 and WSRMP WD 06 and related documents uploaded (candidates for CD 3)

The line numbers in WSRM WD 10 are not useable and
make it impossible to
make line numbered comments on the WD.  

For example, please look at Section 1 Introduction.  There are multiple
occurrences of line 77 in this section.  Scanning forward there are
multiple occurrences on line 100 starting at Section 1.4.  

This problem occurs through the WSRM 10 WD.

The problem does not appear to occur in WSRMP WD 06.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: February 18, 2006 4:12 PM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] WSRM WD 10 and WSRMP WD 06 and related documents
uploaded
> (candidates for CD 3)
> 
> All,
> 
> The editors have made the following documents ready for review as
> promised. These documents should be considered candidates for CD 3
(as
> we agreed on previous calls so as to make stable docs available for
> interop). Please send comments/corrections/etc to the list.
> 
> 1) WSRM WD-10 PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16754/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-10.pdf
> 
> 2) WSRM WD-09/WD-10 Diff PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16756/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-09-10-diff.pdf
> 
> 3) WSRMP WD-06 PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16753/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-06.pdf
> 
> 4) WSRMP WD-05/WD-06 Diff PDF format:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16755/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-05-06-diff.pdf
> 
> 5) WSRM Schema 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16741/wsrm-1.1-schema-200602.xsd
> 
> 6) WSRM Schema 200510/200602 Diff (diff -w):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16748/wsrm-1.1-schema-200510-200602.dif
> 
> 7) WSRM WSDL 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16742/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200602.wsdl
> 
> 8) WSRM WSDL 200510/200602 Diff (diff -w):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16749/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200510-200602.dif
> 
> 9) WSRMP Schema 200602:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16743/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200602.xsd
> 
> 10) WSRMP Schema 200510/200602 Diff (diff -2):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-
> editors/download.php/16750/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200510-200602.dif
> 
> 
> Please note that the editors have made three non-editorial changes
that
> were **not** authorized by the TC (as part of the issue resolutions),
> but follow from the context of the resolution or are bug fixes.
> 
> 1) In the resolution of issue i078, the WSDL changes that were
approved
> made TerminateSequence and TerminateSequenceResponse two separate
> operations. Clearly, they are meant to be a single operation similar
to
> CloseSequence/CloseSequenceResponse (that was one of the points of
issue
> i078). We assumed that this was indeed the intention and went ahead
with
> the fix.
> 2) In the proposal for i087, the attribute extensibility was missing
> from the description, but was present in the pseudo-schema (with a
> malformed syntax). Since the other text in the proposal essentially
said
> migrate the element from WSRMP spec to WSRM and the element in WSRMP
> spec had the attribute extensibility, it was added to the spec.
> 3) A new fault code wsrm:SequenceClosed was added to the WSRM schema
> (this was a mismatch between the existing spec and schema)
> 
> Chairs: can we get this on next week's agenda so that the TC can
ratify
> this (or not). Of course if the TC does not agree with these fixes,
the
> editors will pull them out.
> 
> Also note that the resolution of issue 83 has not been incorporated
> (requires going through the whole spec and changing wordings around
> possibly every RFC 2119 keyword). This will be done for the subsequent
> draft.
> 
> -WSRM editorial team
> --