OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts


Please check and make sure the files are working as expected ... Apparently some portion of the OASIS website header was copied into
the RDDL files; these aren't working properly. My suggestion would be to just point to the OASIS logo from the templates location
and omit the rest of the heading.

http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISLogo.jpg

Thanks!

Mary 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:48 PM
> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Marc Goodner; Gilbert Pilz
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James Bryce Clark
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> 
> 
> Mary,
> 
> Would it be possible to upload the WS-RX CD-02 artifacts 
> today? The weekly meeting for our TC is scheduled for 
> tomorrow and it would be great to have the CD-02 artifacts 
> published and available in advance of the weekly meeting.
> 
> -- Sanjay
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2006 10:38 AM
> > To: 'Marc Goodner'; Patil, Sanjay; 'Gilbert Pilz'
> > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'; 'James Bryce 
> > Clark'
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > 
> > Hi Mark,
> > 
> >   I was actually trying to say that OASIS does *not* have 
> an explicit 
> > policy regarding the reserved use of keywords. I don't believe the 
> > issue had ever arisen in the past; staff has submitted this as an 
> > issue to the Board TC Process Committee.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Mary
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:21 PM
> > > To: Patil, Sanjay; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
> > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James
> > Bryce Clark
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > 
> > > Mary, you imply that OASIS does now have some approved accepted 
> > > policy regarding things like keywords and products.
> > > I don't think that is correct. If there is an approved 
> policy that 
> > > covers this pleas provide a reference to it.
> > > 
> > > Marc Goodner
> > > Technical Diplomat
> > > Microsoft Corporation
> > > Tel: (425) 703-1903
> > > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:05 AM
> > > To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
> > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James
> > Bryce Clark
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Mary,
> > > 
> > > The use of the date identifier in the URI is a deliberate
> > decision the
> > > WS-RX TC made after sweating over a lot of discussions. 
> > > Please note that
> > > the product version identifiers are part of the artifact 
> names (last 
> > > token in the URI) in our scheme .
> > > 
> > > So I must say that currently we do not much choice and
> > would strongly
> > > prefer to keep the format of the URI as suggested in 
> Gil's original 
> > > email.
> > > 
> > > --Sanjay
> > > WS-RX TC Co-Chair
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2006 7:23 AM
> > > > To: 'Gilbert Pilz'
> > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'
> > > > Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Gilbert,
> > > > 
> > > >   My apologies for the delay in responding; I've been trying to 
> > > > research the decision regarding the WS-RX TC's use of
> > the keyword
> > > > WSRM. It appears that since we did not have an explicit 
> policy in 
> > > > place reserving the keyword for use only by the WSRM 
> TC, and since 
> > > > the WSRM TC does not call its work product "wsrm", that 
> WS-RX is 
> > > > being allowed to use the WSRM as a product designation.
> > > There's one
> > > > other problem however,and that's the use of a date identifier 
> > > > rather than a version number - The OASIS Library is 
> configured to 
> > > > identify TC work products by version number (i.e.
> > > > docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/). Is it possible for the 
> > > > editors to reconfigure the documents to match that scheme?
> > > > 
> > > >   Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Mary
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:58 AM
> > > > > To: Mary McRae
> > > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover
> > > > > Subject: RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mary,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any word on the review of the WS-RX CD-02 artifacts? 
> The rest of 
> > > > > the TC is going to want status from me on Thursday so 
> I need to 
> > > > > know what to tell them.
> > > > > 
> > > > > - gp
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Robin Cover [mailto:robin@oasis-open.org]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:04 PM
> > > > > > To: Gilbert Pilz
> > > > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary McRae
> > > > > > Subject: Re: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Robin,
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > Attached is a zip archive containing the artifacts that
> > > > > make up the
> > > > > > > WX-RX TC's Committee Draft 02. The archive structure is
> > > > > > intended for
> > > > > > > unpacking under http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx. You will
> > > > > > notice that
> > > > > > > we have included the RDDL documents 
> > > > > > > "wsrm/200510/wsrm-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html" and 
> > > > > > > "wsrmp/200510/wsrmp-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html". In order for
> > > > > > things to work
> > > > > > > as intended these files need to be the default page for 
> > > > > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510/"; and 
> > > > > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510/";
> > respectively.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Please let me know if any of the above is unclear or
> > > there is a
> > > > > > > problem with organizing the web space in this way.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Gilbert Pilz
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi Gilbert,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm forwarding your request to Mary McRae, currently listed
> > > > > as one of
> > > > > > the OASIS Staff Contacts for the WS-RX TC, and responsible
> > > > > for the QA
> > > > > > work on approved specs as delegated to the OASIS TC Admin.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm pleased that your TC has decided to use RDDL documents: 
> > > > > > it makes a lot of sense to me.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Congratulations on TC progress resulting in these
> > > > approved CD specs.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Robin Cover
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]