RE: [ws-rx-editors] new WDs

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Thanks Marc - I put all of these into
WD11.  As for the stuff in table one - I decided to just go ahead
and make the change - it puts it more in line with all of the other specs
and if this monkey gets slapped for it... oh well   ;-)
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

02/22/2006 11:25 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-editors] new WDs

I haven’t finished reviewing
the core spec… its been nuts this week… but one typo I did find was on
line 236, two periods.. Also the sentence that follows that period begins
with an xml element name, starting that sentence with “The” might make
it more readable. 
 
Line 336 has an invalid mailto:
link in it I only saw by actually looking at the doc on screen, I usually
review these on paper with a red pen so I’m not likely to catch anymore
like that.
 
Also line 84 is the first
mention of WSS and WS-Policy but there is no reference to them, e.g. [WS-Policy].

 
This one might need to be
a new issue, but in table one S is defined as the SOAP 1.2 namespace and
S1 is SOAP 1.1. I think there should be an S2 as SOAP 1.2 namespace and
then S would be defined as S1 or S2. Thoughts on that one?
 
I’m not confident I’ll
review any further tonight since I had my first call at 7AM today and my
tomorrow is at 8AM (and I’m so looking forward to more “anonymous” discussion).
If I do I’ll post here as soon as I find any more editorial nits. If I
do get through the rest and don’t find any more I’ll also let you know.
 
BTW, I’ve finished with
RM Policy and don’t have anything to add to what has already been noted.
 
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:00 PM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] new WDs
 

All, 
 I created new WDs for the specs - might be jumping the gun a bit but I
didn't want to lose the couple of minor typos that have been noticed so
far.  If we don't accept the current WDs as CD and need to reopen
the old WDs then I'll just erase these new WDs and retro fit the changes.
-Doug