Re: [ws-rx] Editorial comments on RM Policy assertion

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Marc - fixed these in the next WD of
the wsrmp spec. 
The WD # is also fixed in the next WD.
Yes, Anish alphabetized the authors.

thanks,
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

02/23/2006 08:21 PM

To	<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc	<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	[ws-rx] Editorial comments on RM Policy assertion

I see no reason this should hold up the
CD. I’m also not sure an issue really needs to be raised this as it doesn’t
seem like anything of any substance that needs to be debated. 
 
What I noticed was that in the namespace
table of the RM Policy assertion only wsp and wsrmp are there, however
in the assertion example both wsdl and wsu are used. So I think both of
these should be in the table as well.
 
Also, I guess this is moot if the CD is
approved but if this is WD06 why is it WD05 on the title page and document
identifier (but it is 06 in the footer)? What is really odd is that in
the diff version it shows 06 is in both spots and 05 is deleted. Furthermore
in the no change bars versions the authors are in a different order. Is
this the right version of the doc without change bars?
 
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/