Nope, just finding less
editorial issues than normal. The spec is looking good, it will be very
polished by the time we get o the PR candidate I think thanks to you guys.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006
12:49 PM
To: Marc Goodner
Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Am I
going to be this terrible?
You must be bored today ;-)
I'd
prefer to leave it as 200602 - less change of a mess-up, nothing as changed
this month, and as you said leave it open to use 200603 if we need it.
-Doug
|
"Marc Goodner"
<mgoodner@microsoft.com>
03/01/2006 03:03 PM
|
|
To
|
<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[ws-rx-editors] Am I going to be this
terrible?
|
|
Yes.
Assuming
the CD passes, should the namespace be updated to 200603 rather than 200602?
Before
you throw anything at me I’m not sure it should be. Particularly if we
put together a new CD to go to PR before the end of this month. I’m not
sure that’s feasible, but if it is we might want to still have the
availability of the 200603 dated namespace.
Marc
Goodner
Technical
Diplomat
Microsoft
Corporation
Tel:
(425) 703-1903
Blog:
http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/