RE: [ws-rx-editors] Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13.odt (wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-13.odt) uploaded

["Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>]

Responses inline . . .

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 11:58 PM

[stuff deleted]

> On line 329 of the change bar version you dropped the 
> additions of the <wsrm: ... > around CloseSequenceResponse, 
> was that intentional?

Yeah. Lately I've been thinking that we are over-using the "looks just
like the XML" trick. Its ok if you are refering to a specific elements
but, to be mind-numbingly exact about it (and hey, who doesn't?), there
is no such thing a "<wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse> message". There are
"SOAP messages who's <s:Body> element contains the
<wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse> element" but we don't want to have to say
that every time.

I think its ok to use a shorthand like "CloseSequenceResponse message",
but I think its weird to then act as if you are being precise by
including the XML syntax elements.

> The only other comment I have is why did you introduce the 
> space between Reliable and Messaging in the title?

Because "ReliableMessaging" is not a word. The main title should consist
of proper English words. The semi-sub-title "WS-ReliableMessaing" starts
mashing things together in a computer-science way.

- gp