Re: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Already fixed the 15 vs 14 issue in
the latest one.  Dunno what to do about the line # issue other than
get one of the other editors (who doesn't see this issue) to produce the
pdf files - or revert back to the previous version of OO.  Gil did
you ever hear from your friends at Sun(?) who were going to take a look
at this?
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

06/13/2006 12:34 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	[ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

The WD15 draft tile page
still says WD14. The line numbers of WD15 alternate, randomly it seems,
between 78, 79 and 80 from page 4 to page 60. Obviously we can’t use this
as a base doc if we can’t cite line numbers.
 
The WD14 has line number
issues as well, just not as extreme. Top of page 9 is a good example.
 
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:56 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
 

All, 
  I believe all outstanding issues have been applied to the editor's
working drafts.  One suggestion, by Marc, was to move the wsdl to
be after the schema (instead of after the sample messages) - we decided
to do this change as the first change in a new WD so that people could
see that diff in isolation.  I've attached three pdf diffs to this
note: 
        14-diff.pdf contains all of the outstanding
editorial and issue related changes since WD13
        15-diff.pdf contains just the movement of the
wsdl section 
        10-diff.pdf contains WD10 of the policy spec
If there are additional changes needed please use WD15-diff.pdf's as the
base doc. If there is a different version of the docs that people would
like to see please let me know - hopefully, this addresses PaulC's concern
mentioned on the last TC call.

thanks 
-Doug