RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD ready

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Marc,
  thanks for the review.  I
fixed the 'nit'.  As for MC being 01 vs 05 - dunno - just picked 05
to be consistent with the others.  Can easily switch it if people
think we should.
As for the Appendixes - I'm stumped
- I've been trying to get OO to turn those into links all day w/o luck.
 Will keep trying.
Guess I'll upload the doc for the full
TC to review.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com

Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

02/02/2007 06:50 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	"ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD ready

Only one nit from me. In
RMP, note the unnecessary “the”:
“Note
that when there are multiple policy alternatives the of
the RM Assertion, the Delivery Assurance on each MUST NOT conflict.”
 
Couple of comments:
Should MC be CD01? I don’t
have strong feelings, just asking.
 
Appendixes in MC, RM and
RMP TOCs are not links. Is there some tooling problem that prevents that
from working?
I have not clicked all the
links in MC, RM and RMP, but the internal references I tried at random
and the active TOC ones seem to be OK.
 
 
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:58 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] CD ready
Importance: High
 

All, 
  the CD5 folder in the editor's area contains all of the files for
CD5 - please take a look and if they look ok I'll post them to the main
TC page.  But I do need at least a couple of +1's :-)

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com