[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded
Mary Our editors have had a look at the new template and they are concerned that switching to the new template will affect the PR timing and our vote. They have suggested the following approach: * The main difference between the new template and the old is the IPR text. * Therefore we add the IPR text to the current document for PR * During PR the editors switch to the new template and work on the HTML output * In addition they fix up the RDDL document during that period I think this addresses the problems for PR. Firstly, as long as the PR doc has the right IPR text the formatting shouldn't be an issue. Secondly, as I understand it the RDDL isn't a necessary piece of the PR. I have asked the editors to produce you the docs with the updated IPR text. Please let me know if this is acceptable. Paul Mary McRae wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I'm afraid that there's some work to be done on the package before it can be sent out for public review. Since the > documents will need to be changed, I'm going to ask you to switch to the new templates as well, which satisfy the Naming > Guidelines and Metadata policy that was adopted last fall. > > The template home page is here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ > and you should be using the template for the 4-15-2005 IPR notices: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.dot (Word) or > http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.ott (OO) > > The user guide (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASIS_Specification_Template_Guidelines.html) hopefully does a good > job of explaining what information goes where as well as links to the specific sections of the policy documents. > > Robin and I are also discussing how to handle the new/old namespace - including noting the previous namespace in the > current RDDL and potentially making some note in the older one (200608). As I'm just reviewing this on Sat AM, I don't > anticipate being able to resolve those questions until early next week but will get back to the TC as soon as possible. > > ---- > > WS-Reliable Messaging (wsrm) > Specification: > In general: > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice > section from the rear of the document to the front. > > 1. The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug > line. However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > 2. The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > 3. Acknowledgements: > Christopher Ferris-Editor(BM) -- (should be IBM?) > > DIFF (PDF file) > There are two diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that compares the version previously submitted for PR > (200608) with the current document. > > RDDL > *NOTE There should be some mention of the previous namespace; there is also discussion underway about what information > should be placed at the previous (200608) namespace indicating that it's been superceded. > > Schema > The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > WSDL > The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > > ---- > > > WS-MakeConnection (wsmc) > Specification: > In general: > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice > section from the rear of the document to the front. > > Specifics: > 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be marked accordingly (Committee Draft 01) > 2. Revision history must note that this document began with extracted section(s) from WSRM and identify those > section(s). Alternatively, this is a new document and subject to a 60-day public review. > 3. The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug > line. However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > RDDL > 1. This is the first CD of this document and should be marked accordingly (revision 01) > > Schema > The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > WSDL > The wsdl does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > DIFF > For some reason there's a diff file in this directory; this is the first instance of this document. > > > ---- > > > WS-RM Policy (wsrmp) > Specification: > In general: > Update cover page, Status and Notice section to correspond to the templates noted above. This includes moving the Notice > section from the rear of the document to the front. > > 1.The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug > line. However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > DIFF (PDF file) > There are two diff files in the zip; I need a single diff file that compares the version previously submitted for PR > (200608) with the current document. > > RDDL > *NOTE There should be some mention of the previous namespace; there is also discussion underway about what information > should be placed at the previous (200608) namespace indicating that it's been superceded. > > Schema > The schema does not need to contain the entire notice; it is acceptable for it to contain only the Copyright slug line. > However, the notice included is for Legacy IPR TCs rather than that contained in the 4-15-05 IPR Policy. > > ---- > > I'll try to turn new files around as quickly as possible but can make no promises beyond the stated 5 business day SLA. > > Regards, > > Mary > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:43 PM >> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org >> Cc: gilbert.pilz@bea.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org; >> marypmcrae@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded >> >> Mary >> >> The basic situation is that 22286 has more beautiful HTML and >> 22268 has the images in it. >> >> I propose that we go with 22268 for PR (since it is more >> accurate if less beautiful) and that in the meantime the >> editors will prepare a beautified version of the HTML that >> will be the basis of our CS. >> >> Please remember to include our HTML disclaimer! >> >> Thanks >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> Mary McRae wrote: >>> So I should use this one (22286) rather than 22268? >>> >>> m >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: gilbert.pilz@bea.com [mailto:gilbert.pilz@bea.com] >>>> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:16 PM >>>> To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org >>>> Cc: marypmcrae@gmail.com >>>> Subject: [ws-rx] Groups - ws-rx_cd05.zip uploaded >>>> >>>> Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files. >>>> >>>> -- Gilbert Pilz >>>> >>>> The document revision named ws-rx_cd05.zip has been submitted by >>>> Gilbert Pilz to the OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange >>>> (WS-RX) TC document repository. This document is revision #1 of >>>> ws-rx_cd05.zip. >>>> >>>> Document Description: >>>> Complete WS-RX CD05 package in proper directory structure and RDDL >>>> files. >>>> Replaced HTML versions with Marc Goodner's better HTML files. >>>> >>>> View Document Details: >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/document.ph >>>> p?document_id=22286 >>>> >>>> Download Document: >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.ph >>>> p/22286/ws-rx_cd05.zip >>>> >>>> Revision: >>>> This document is revision #1 of ws-rx_cd05.zip. The >> document details >>>> page referenced above will show the complete revision history. >>>> >>>> >>>> PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email >>>> application may be breaking the link into two pieces. >>>> You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the >>>> address field of your web browser. >>>> >>>> -OASIS Open Administration >>>> >>> >> -- >> Paul Fremantle >> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair >> >> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle >> paul@wso2.com >> (646) 290 8050 >> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com >> > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com (646) 290 8050 "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]