[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] [Fwd: Re: Help please [about date-less/version-lessspec URIs]]
Re: ========================================================================================= - latest URI is now: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/wsrm.pdf Robin - is this an ok URI? - Robin/Mary - is it ok that we have other sections (like 'conformance' and 'namespace' in section 1 ?) - reformatting the contributors section - each person got their own line now - Robin/Mary - can we do multiple-columns or does it have to be this way? Its a lot of space. [...] Mary/Robin - could I ask you guys to look over this doc to see if it conforms to the new template? I tried to match all of the sections and formatting styles as best I could. ========================================================================================= Sorry for delay... I've had connectivity issues and other distractions. On the first question: "latest URI is now: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/wsrm.pdf OK?" I think the intent in the Naming Guidelines is that a "Latest Version: " URI set will have three formats (or possibly two, if the editable source is XHTML): HTML, PDF, editable source. The examples could be clearer, since they envision the minimal case in which HTML == editable source, so the two "Latest Version: " formats are PDF and HTML. See: http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/metadata.html#specURIs In the case of WSRM/WSRMP/WSMC, if the editable source is DOC, then the "Latest Version: " URIs should be, I think: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/wsrm.pdf http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/wsrm.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/wsrm.doc Right, Mary? Best wishes, Robin ================================================================================ On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Mary McRae wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Looks good. Yes, it's okay to include namespace and conformance in section 1; note that with the upcoming changes to > the TC Process there will be a new section created for conformance requirements but these docs will be through the cycle > before those changes go into effect. Multiple columns for acknowledgements is fine. > > A couple of things: > > Latest Approved Version URI: This is intended to act in the same manner as "Latest Version URI" except that it would > skip over any working drafts or revisions that had not yet been approved by the TC (i.e. CD 01 R 02 is unofficial until > approved as CD 02) > > lines 56 and 62: add a trailing slash to URI > > All URIs should be created as Hyperlinks so that a reader can actually navigate to the location directly from the > document. If you highlight the link itself, then go to "insert" -> Hyperlink it will bring up a dialog box. By default > it should create a link to the same text that you highlighted. Just save and you now have a navigable link. > > Trademarks - according to the policy, all terms related to the specification and the TC are to be listed - this would > include "WS-ReliableMessaging", wsrm, WS-RX, etc. > > That's everything that's jumping out at me. > > Regards, > > Mary > > > > _____ > > From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:44 PM > To: Paul Fremantle > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; robin@oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] [Fwd: Re: Help please [about date-less/version-less spec URIs]] > > > > All, > I've gone thru the RM spec and reformatted things per the latest template. In terms of edits to the doc, I tried to > not do any textual changes with the exception of the following: > - renamed it CD06 - should probably have been optimistic and called it CS :-) > - latest URI is now: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/wsrm.pdf Robin - is this an ok URI? > - moved the normative and non-normative sections to the top of the doc - per the template > - Robin/Mary - is it ok that we have other sections (like 'conformance' and 'namespace' in section 1 ?) > - reformatting the contributors section - each person got their own line now - Robin/Mary - can we do multiple-columns > or does it have to be this way? Its a lot of space. > > The doc is here: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/22537/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-06.doc > > Mary/Robin - could I ask you guys to look over this doc to see if it conforms to the new template? I tried to match all > of the sections and formatting styles as best I could. > > Editors - please give this doc a scan. Things to look for: > - At times I had to manually re-add some text/URLs (like in the references sections) to get things to format correctly. > - And watch for variables in the examplars (e.g. xs:string) not being in italics > - paragraph numbering and bullets - tried to make sure we were consistent across the entire doc w.r.t. indenting etc... > - missing hyper-links - examples and code snippets were removed on purpose, but others should probably be there. > - check bookmarks - I had to redo them all by hand - for some reason they were all messed up after I moved the (non) > normative sections > > Once people look this over and are ok with it, then I'll move on to RMP and MC. > > thanks > -Doug > ______________________________________________________ > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> > > > 02/19/2007 10:51 AM > > > To > "ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> > > cc > > Subject > [ws-rx-editors] [Fwd: Re: Help please [about date-less/version-less spec URIs]] > > > > > > > FYI here is Robin's advice for our URIs. > > Paul > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Help please [about date-less/version-less spec URIs] > Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:42:08 -0500 (EST) > From: Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> > To: Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> > CC: Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> > References: <45D06D58.4050700@wso2.com> > > Paul, > > Re: > > > I would have thought that we'd want a URL that was date-less as well as > > version-less. > > I apologize for failing to respond to your request for advice > in a timely manner. The request is quite reasonable, as > seems to be proven by the successful W3C practice of publishing > its recommendation-track specifications at URIs like: > > Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-semantics/ > Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core > Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms2/ > Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/ > > Initially, when I saw the proposal for "Something like" > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc > > I was stumped, because we have a commitment to use the > "directory URIs" [slash "/" and slashless ""] as identifiers > for directory listings, as in this current example: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/ > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm > > *That index listing is ugly now, but we have plans to make it > more usable. > > The Naming Guidelines do require that specifications be > assigned a "Latest Version:" URI, which is a URI alias pointing > to the resource that is the current/latest at any point in > time. See: > > "Specification URIs" > http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/metadata.html#specURIs > > The OASIS membership provided clear feedback (ASIS review) that we should > impose no single format for the "Latest Version:" URI -- allowing the TCs > to select something reasonable, suitable to their needs and sensibilities. > > Some of the examples provided for "Latest Version:" URI are > dateless, as you can see in the section "Specification URIs" cited above: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/exampleTC/fruitMarkup/v2/fruit2.html > > No examples are "version-less" though -- in part, because some reviewers > asked that we NOT assume genetic continuity between [e.g.] DITA 1.0 > and DITA 3.0, such as might be implied by a generic/version-agnostic > URI like this, which otherwise could serve as the > latest/dateless/version-less > URI for all 'DITA' specs. > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/TR > > Their argument was that an entirely different group of people might > work on "DITA 3.0" than worked on "DITA 1.0", the the DITA-3 people > might not want to be forced to use a URI that implies "DITA 3.2" is > the "latest" version of the DITA 1.0 product, in close continuity with > it. > > We use the term "Version" in a fairly specific way in connection with > identifying a specification version: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/metadata.html#version > > I *do* encourage you to bring up this issue with the WS-RX TC editors, > however, since selection of a "Latest Version:" URI is needed for > wsrm, wsrmp, and wsmc. In the WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 spec here: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-05.pdf > > the text says: > > Latest Version: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702 > > and that's not what we have in mind; that's the NS URI. > > The spec title page has a dsignated place for the associated > NS URI(s), e.g., > > Declared XML Namespaces: > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702 > > I'll try to make myself available, if needed, to help > think through (or review candidates for) possible > Latest Version URIs suitable for the WS-RX TC's specs. > > Caveats: > > * The TAB and Board are considering options for a method of > using the concept/term "normative" [or "official"] > format (XHTML vs. PDF vs. EditableSource). The > results might lead to a change in the Naming Guidelines > so that there would be only one "Latest Version:" URI > printed on a spec title page, not 2-3 URIs, as in: > > Latest Version: > > http://example.com/fishing/fishML.pdf > http://example.com/fishing/fishML.doc > http://example.com/fishing/fishML.html > > * The OASIS IT programming team is preparing a new > URI aliasing tool (serving some of the functions > of Apache mod_alias, mod_rewrite, etc.) to give > us greater flexibility in handling the URI > aliasing mechanisms [server-side URI rewrite > in addition to client-side redirect], but it's > not certain when that will be activated. > ***Privately***: see a prototype here: > > http://docs3.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/ > > Please don't publish that -- it might be buggy. > > Again, I sincerely apologize for not responding on time; > please forgive me. > > Best wishes. > > Robin Cover > > ------------- > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Paul Fremantle wrote: > > > Robin > > > > Can you advise us on this one please? > > > > Paul > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:19:01 -0500 > > From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> > > To: Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com> > > CC: 'Mary McRae' <marypmcrae@gmail.com>, mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>, Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>, 'Robin > > Cover' <robin@oasis-open.org>, ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > > > > > I would have thought that we'd want a URL that was date-less as well as > > version-less. Something like: > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc > > > > That way even if we have a v.Next the URL would still not need to > > change. Mary - is this possible? > > > > thanks > > -Doug > > ______________________________________________________ > > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > > > *Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>* > > > > 02/11/2007 10:40 PM > > > > > > To > > Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>, "mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org" > > <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > > cc > > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "'Mary McRae'" <marypmcrae@gmail.com>, > > "ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org" > > <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>, "'Robin Cover'" > > <robin@oasis-open.org> > > Subject > > RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My reading is that Dug has made all of the requested changes except one > > we are still discussing. The open issue is what to use for the latest > > link in the doc. > > > > My recommendation is to just use the current namespace. Mary has > > suggested a permanent latest URI could be assigned for this use. I'm not > > inherently opposed to that but I'd prefer some more discussion before > > putting it into practice. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] > > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:30 PM > > To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > Cc: Marc Goodner; 'Doug Davis'; 'Mary McRae'; > > ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover' > > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > I'd like to thank Marc, Doug and Mary for all your efforts this weekend. > > > > Can anyone give me a brief status update? I've seen a ton of useful > > messages but I haven't quite figured out what is still needed before the PR. > > > > Thanks > > Paul > > > > Mary McRae wrote: > > > We can also invent another URI to be used - like > > > docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/wsrm-v1.1.doc etc. - that way even > > > if the date changes we're still talking about the latest version of the > > > 1.1 spec ... > > > > > > m > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > *From:* Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] > > > *Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:18 PM > > > *To:* Doug Davis; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > > *Cc:* 'Mary McRae'; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > > *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > So on 2, yeah we don't have anything like that. I think the best we > > > can do is a link to the namespace as that could eventually contain > > > the previous/latest links there. The only other immediate > > > alternative I can think of would be the Public TC page. > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote for now would be to use the namespace. The reason is that if > > > we progress with the same namespace from this PR, and I'm pretty > > > hopeful we will, then the CS will be in that location with a link to > > > the previous CD for the same namespace. That seems to best satisfy > > > the intent. > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] > > > *Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:38 PM > > > *To:* mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > > *Cc:* 'Mary McRae'; Marc Goodner; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > > *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. I'll remove the [insert...] since, as Marc said, I don't think we > > > have any. > > > 2. The guideline says: > > > A bookmarkable, version-agnostic, generic URI serving as a URI alias > > > which is always associated with the latest/current specification > > > instance, thus having a changing referent; it serves to identify and > > > directly locate each successive published instance of a developing > > > specification, through time [Label: Latest Version] > > > Do we have a URL like that? As far as I know all of our URLs have > > > dates in them. Can Oasis assign us a non-dated set of URLs? > > > 3. Done - as much as I could anyway :-) > > > > > > Latest zip is here: > > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/22331/CD05.zip > > > > > > (you guys are probably sick of me sending huge zip files) > > > Will replace the individual files in the CD5 folder once people 'ok' > > > it but I think I still need those static URLs mentioned in #2. > > > > > > thanks > > > -Doug > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > > > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > > > *"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>* > > > Sent by: Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com> > > > > > > 02/11/2007 07:54 PM > > > > > > Please respond to > > > <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > To > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "'Marc Goodner'" > > <mgoodner@microsoft.com> > > > > > > cc > > > > > > > > > > > > "'Mary McRae'" <marypmcrae@gmail.com>, > > > <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > Subject > > > > > > > > > > > > RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before you do that ;-) > > > > > > 1. in all three spec files -- pay attention to the last para of the > > > Notices section. It refers to OASIS' new Trademark policy. In the > > > first line you'll see "[insert specific trademarked names, > > > abbreviations, etc. here]" - any terms that the TC believes should > > > be trademarked should be listed there and the boilerplate text > > removed. > > > > > > 2. also, for "latest version" the intent is to use a URI that will > > > always bring up the most recent copy of the spec (see samples in > > > naming guidelines documents). Oops - just found another bad link on > > > the templates page. > > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateGuidelines.html > > > section 3.4.3 or here: > > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/metadata.html#specURIs > > > > > > > > > 3. I apparently also messed up when I created the new templates for > > > OO (and possibly Word). There were supposed to be two more > > > categories on the cover page between Editors and Abstract: > > > Related Work > > > and > > > Declared XML Namespaces > > > (can be seen here: > > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV3.0.html) > > > > > > > > > No penalties for not including #3, but bonus points awarded if you > > > do ;-) > > > > > > I'm going to go watch the Grammys ... I think you guys have it under > > > control and we'll be all set for announcement tomorrow. > > > > > > m > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] * > > > Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:29 PM* > > > To:* Marc Goodner* > > > Cc:* Mary McRae; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; > > > ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org* > > > Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > Actually, I was hoping you might be able to generate new HTML by > > > importing it into Word :-) > > > > > > thanks > > > -Doug > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > > > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > > > *Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>* > > > > > > 02/11/2007 07:22 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org" > > > <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > > > > > > cc > > > > > > > > > > > > Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>, > > > "ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org" > > > <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > Subject > > > > > > > > > > > > RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick turnaround on the doc Dug. Mary, thanks a ton > > > for staying engaged with us over the weekend. > > > > > > A quick scan and this looks good to me. It looks like the correct > > > Notices now, but I defer to Mary on that. > > > > > > This one doesn't have the HTML in it. We're we just going to update > > > the previous generated HTML by hand? > > > * > > > From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] * > > > Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2007 3:17 PM* > > > To:* mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org* > > > Cc:* Mary McRae; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org* > > > Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > *********************** > > > Warning: Your file, CD05.zip, contains more than 32 files after > > > decompression and cannot be scanned. > > > *********************** > > > > > > > > > > > > ok - let's give this one a try. > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > -Doug > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > > > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > > > *"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>* > > > Sent by: Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com> > > > > > > 02/11/2007 06:05 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > Please respond to > > > <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > > > > > > cc > > > > > > > > > > > > <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > Subject > > > > > > > > > > > > RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Almost - new Copyright line says: > > > Copyright (c) OASIS(r) 1993-2007. All Rights Reserved. OASIS > > trademark, > > > IPR and other policies apply. > > > > > > And then you'll need to make sure that it's the same in both the > > > spec and the schema/wsdl themselves. > > > > > > m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > * > > > From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] * > > > Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:03 PM* > > > To:* mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org* > > > Cc:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org* > > > Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] RE: CD5.3* > > > Importance:* High > > > > > > > > > Mary, > > > am I correct in assuming that if I replace: > > > <!--> OASIS takes no position regarding the validity or scope > > of any > > > intellectual prop > > > erty or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the > > > implementation or u > > > se of the technology described in this document or the extent to > > > which any licen > > > se under such rights might or might not be available; neither does > > > it represent > > > that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information > > > on OASIS's > > > procedures with respect to rights in OASIS specifications can be > > > found at the OA > > > SIS website. Copies of claims of rights made available for > > > publication and any a > > > ssurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an > > > attempt made to > > > obtain a general license or permission for the use of such > > > proprietary rights by > > > implementors or users of this specification, can be obtained from > > > the OASIS Exe > > > cutive Director. > > > OASIS invites any interested party to bring to its attention any > > > copyrights, pat > > > ents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may > > > cover technol > > > ogy that may be required to implement this specification. Please > > > address the inf > > > ormation to the OASIS Executive Director. > > > Copyright (c) OASIS Open 2002-2007. All Rights Reserved. > > > This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to > > > others, and > > > derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist > > > in its implem > > > entation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in > > > whole or in part > > > , without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright > > > notice and > > > this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. > > > However, th > > > is document itself does not be modified in any way, such as by > > > removing the copy > > > right notice or references to OASIS, except as needed for the > > > purpose of develop > > > ing OASIS specifications, in which case the procedures for > > > copyrights defined in > > > the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights document must be followed, or > > > as require > > > d to translate it into languages other than English. > > > The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be > > > revoked by O > > > ASIS or its successors or assigns. > > > This document and the information contained herein is provided on an > > > "AS IS" bas > > > is and OASIS DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING > > > BUT NOT LIM > > > ITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT > > > INFRINGE AN > > > Y RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR > > > A PARTICULA > > > R PURPOSE. > > > --> > > > > > > with just: > > > > > > <!-- Copyright (c) OASIS Open 2002-2007. All Rights Reserved. --> > > > > > > That'd we'd be ok? > > > > > > thanks > > > -Doug > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > > > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > > > *"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>* > > > Sent by: Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com> > > > > > > 02/11/2007 04:47 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > Please respond to > > > <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > cc > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject > > > > > > > > > > > > RE: CD5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Doug, > > > > > > I haven't unzipped yet, but the schema / wsdl *do* need the Notices > > > section that's inserted as a comment at the beginning of the files > > > changed from the legacy IPR policy language to the 4-15-2005 policy > > > language ... I'm willing to go the extra mile to get this out by end > > > of day Monday since you're working hard to get everything > > accomplished. > > > > > > Mary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > * > > > From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] * > > > Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:26 AM* > > > To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org* > > > Cc:* mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org* > > > Subject:* CD5.3* > > > Importance:* High > > > > > > *********************** > > > Warning: Your file, CD05.zip, contains more than 32 files after > > > decompression and cannot be scanned. > > > *********************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Editors: > > > Here's CD5.3 with the changes Mary wanted. I did not update the > > > schema/wsdl as that was just a suggestion and I wanted to keep the > > > diffs as small as possible. > > > Take a look and see if all looks well. > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > -Doug > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > > > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > > VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 > > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > > paul@wso2.com > > (646) 290 8050 > > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > > VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 > > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > > paul@wso2.com > > (646) 290 8050 > > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > > > > -- > Paul Fremantle > VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > paul@wso2.com > (646) 290 8050 > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]