RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD9

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Yes. Please refer to the templates. docs.oasis-open.org/templates/

 

The date to be displayed on any version of a specification is either the date the draft was produced (in the case of working drafts) or the date of approval by the TC (Committee Drafts, Committee Specs, OASIS Standards). Unless the TC is meeting on Sunday, 1 April shouldn't actually appear on any specs.

 

Mary

---

From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:23 AM
To: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD9

Do we really need exact date on the specs? Wouldn't specifying month and year be sufficient?

-- Sanjay

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Mar 21, 2007 4:37 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] CD9

All,
  in prep for any changes from the policy discussions I created a CD9 folder and uploaded all of the latest files into it.  Someone noticed that the xsd in the doc file had a typo - it was missing a  's="unbounded"'  on a "maxOccur" line.  The actual xsd file itself was fine.  So, I increased the version # on just the WSRMP doc file and fixed this one line.

  Not wanting to exceed my limitations as a monkey I didn't update the date on the files but I suspect they should all be set to April 1st ( coincidence? :-) .  Any comments on this one?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com