Hi
Sanjay,
Once approved, I ask for new versions of the errata documents (documents,
schema, rddl, etc.) indicating the status “Approved Errata” and the date of
approval (as noted in [1] – 7 January 2008). I then upload the documents
to docs.oasis-open.org and add them to the OASIS Standards page listing.
The
TC should also note the status and location on their public home
page.
Some
TCs also create a merged specification – that is, the OS version plus the
errata changes – and that can also be uploaded and noted on the OASIS
Standards page listing.
Let me know if you need my help in pulling any of this
together.
Regards,
Mary
From: Patil, Sanjay
[mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:13
PM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Cc:
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; tom@coastin.com
Subject:
Approved Errata for WS-RM specifications (of WS-RX
TC)
Hi
Mary,
The WS-RX
TC has confirmed by a Full Majority Vote [1] the proposed corrections (that
have been publicly reviewed in Dec 2007) as Approved Errata.
The TC
thinks [2] that in order to formally publish the Approved Errata -
A> The
links for the errata in the specification document should be provided with a
page (pointing to the errata documents)
B> The
TC home page should announce the publication of the Approved Errata
Besides
the above, I think the RDDL documents for the RM specifications should also be
updated to reflect the Approved Errata.
I am
wondering if you have a pre-established list of actions (such as above) to be
taken for formally publishing the Approved Errata.
Thanks,
Sanjay
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/ballot.php?id=1404
[2]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200801/msg00004.html