Re: [ws-rx-editors] Public Review of WSRM specifications

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Mary - please use [1] instead.  It
contains all of the files in the proper OASIS dir structure.  The
files themselves are the same with one exception - the word doc in [1]
has all of the changes accepted.  People outside of the TC don't need
to see the change bars.

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/27417/WS-RX_OS_DirStructured.zip

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com

"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>

02/28/2008 06:53 PM

To	<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
cc	<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	[ws-rx-editors] Public Review of WSRM specifications

Hi Mary,

This is to give you a heads up that the WS-RX TC voted with Full Majority on 2/28 conf-call to submit our latest CDs  for Public Review. The editors are preparing the final package for submission. Meanwhile, if you could also verify the latest package [1] for any potential issues, that will be great.

I also have one question for you -- How long would this PR cycle be, given that these latest CD drafts are a result of the progression of the last OS version (i.e. the latest CD drafts = OS draft + approved errata + some issue resolutions)? The version numbers of latest CD drafts are different than that of their last OS versions, but there are no changes to the namespace defined by these specifications.

Thanks,
Sanjay

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27414/WSRX%20v1.2-CD01.zip