OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Submission Package for WSRM Policy 1.2


One further!

WSRM Policy 1.2
-----------------------
(a) Links to the approved Committee Specification in the TC's document
repository, and any appropriate supplemental documentation for the
specification, both of which must be written using the OASIS templates.
The specification may not have been changed between its approval as a
Committee Specification and its submission to OASIS for consideration as
an OASIS Standard, except for the changes on the title page and running
footer noting the approval status and date.

Web Services ReliableMessaging Policy 1.2
PDF - TBD by OASIS
HTML - TBD by OASIS
Schema - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.2-schema-200702.xsd
Namespace - 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.2-rddl-200702.html


(b) The editable version of all files that are part of the Committee
Specification;

TBD by OASIS

(c) Certification by the TC that all schema and XML instances included
in the specification, whether by inclusion or reference, including
fragments of such, are well formed, and that all expressions are valid;

All schema and XML instances included in the specification are well
formed and all expressions are valid.

(d) A clear English-language summary of the specification;

The WS-ReliableMessaging Policy 1.2 document defines an XML policy
language that enables Web services to advertise their support for the
WS-ReliableMessaging specification. The specification is designed for
use with the WS-Policy Framework. The language aids the interoperability
of nodes that support WS-ReliableMessaging by publishing their support
and requirements for aspects of reliable messaging. For example, an
endpoint may use this specification to indicate that it requires that
the reliable message protocol to be secured using transport level
security. WS-ReliableMessaging Policy is designed to be used with other
policy languages, such as WS-Security Policy, in the scope of the
WS-Policy Framework.

(e) A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to
similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations;

Not applicable

(f) Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they
are successfully using the specification;

Certification via email:
WSO2:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200811/msg00023.html

IBM:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200811/msg00014.html

Microsoft:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200811/msg00013.html

(g) The beginning and ending dates of the public review(s), a pointer to
the announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an account of
each of the comments/issues raised during the public review period(s),
along with its resolution;

First Public Review: 4 March 2008 to 3rd May 2008

Announcement of the first Public Review:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200803/msg00002.html

Public Review Issue and Resolution Log:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr-2008-05-16/Issues.xml

(h) An account of and results of the voting to approve the specification
as a Committee Specification, including the date of the ballot and a
pointer to the ballot;

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/ballot.php?id=1597

(i) An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any
earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification,
together with the originating TC's response to each comment;

This is the first submission to the OASIS membership

(j) A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the
originating TC;

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx-comment/

(k) A pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more Members
who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Specification,
which report may include statements regarding why the member voted
against the specification or that the member believes that Substantive
Changes were made which have not gone through public review; or
certification by the Chair that no minority reports exist.

There are no minority reports.
-- 
Paul Fremantle
CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
VP, Apache Synapse

Office: +44 844 484 8143
Cell: +44 798 447 4618

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]