RE: [ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

I just assumed that the TC would want
to read the scenario doc to make sure it does a good job of covering the
features in the spec - even if specific TC members do not choose to participant
in an interop event. I think we're in agreement - notice I didn't say "allow
the TC to vote on the doc" but rather show them an initial draft of
the doc.  Personally, I'd like to give them the opportunity to give
feedback but not give them a vote.  :-)
thanks,
-Doug

"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>

12/06/2005 02:27 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F

I think this group should first
clearly outline its touch points with the TC in regards to the inputs from
this group to the TC that may possibly affect the TC deliverables, timeline
dependencies, etc. For example, I don't see how a schedule for producing
a scenario doc by itself would be of any interest to the larger TC. 
 
Given that a scenarios doc or
an interop report is not part of the TC deliverables as such, I believe
that the TC would at most expect this group to validate the spec by producing
interop scenarios and by conducting the actual interop testing. In that
regard, the TC may want to know the overall timeline of this subgroup so
that any issues revealed in the process of creating the scenarios and conducting
the interop get filed and resolved early on and more importantly well within
the chartered time period of the TC (one year from Jun 23, 2004).
 
So may I suggest that this subgroup
first present to the TC the high level roadmap and schedule of its activities
(creating scenario doc, hosting interop, consolidating issues, second run
of the previous steps, etc). It will obviously be great if this subgroup
can in addition report on any concrete plans/material for the initial milestones
at the F2F.
 
 
Thanks,
Sanjay

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 06, 2005 10:54 AM
To: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F


I think this group should give the a TC a date for when it can provide
an initial draft of a scenario doc and a proposed date for an interop event.
Perhaps we could, thru email, settle on a target date we could propose
to the TC during the f2f? 
What about end of Jan (27th?) as a target? 
-Doug

Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>

12/06/2005 01:33 PM

To	ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject	[ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F

Folks

This group has been silent since it started. In order that we are 
effective at the F2F it would be good to start the discussions now.

Firstly, what agenda items would you like to discuss at the F2F.

We have a rough plan to have remote based interop following the next 
Committee Draft.

I think we need a review of the donated interop scenarios based on  two
aspects:

1) are they complete enough?
2) how do they need to change based on the updated specifications?

Paul

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Yahoo IM: paulfremantle
VOIP: +44 844 986 2874
Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729
Fax:  +44 844 484 7459 
paul@wso2.com