OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-implement message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc

I'd be ok with including these issues in the interop as long as they appeared, at least, in a WD.  Although, I'd add the resolution of the STR to the list too.

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

01/27/2006 05:30 PM

"Paul Fremantle" <paul@wso2.com>
RE: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc

It seems we should also evaluate other issues that are pending for a WD
like this as well as other issues that are not closed but we may be
close on. A quick look at the issue list and I would pick the following
as potentially having the most impact to the interop scenarios:
- i021
- i078
- i090

Any reason we wouldn't want to go to another CD immediately from a new
WD that at a minimum had i085 applied? That would give a pretty stable
reference point for the interop activities.

Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 1:03 PM
To: Marc Goodner
Cc: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Questions on interop doc


I think i085 is the key issue to include in the interop. If we could get

a WD = CD2+i085 then I think that would be a great basis. I was going to

suggest this on the call. I also know that Dug suggested this on a
previous chat.

I'd be interested to know if there is anyone who would object to that


Marc Goodner wrote:
> I read tea leaves and incorporated the change to Close from i085 in
> the current interop doc. There is no spec that reflects that change
> today, certainly not CD02 that the interop doc points to. So the
> question is what version of the spec should this point to? Should it
> be a CD, like 02, + issues resolved up to N date? If the later then
> should we get a WD at that date, with a new namespace (making an
> exception to the rule in i088) that we could be given to a developer
> to reference? Or should we get to that date and do another extra CD
> from what we have already planned?
> Do we need all the issues closed before we can go forward with this?
> Sanjay indicated he thought we needed more progress on the issues, but

> with under ten already it seems to me that means all them are closed.
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/


Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair


"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]