ws-rx-implement message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] off-line testing made easy
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:09:59 -0500
That can work too - but to be honest
I get annoyed when I have to go searching around for all of the various
URLs that one particular impl has up - its a lot easier when I can just
point my test client at one url and let it go. Now, if we could all agree
on using the query string part of the URL to pass these flags then that
would be ok too :-)
thanks,
-Doug
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>
02/27/2006 10:02 AM
|
To
| Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [ws-rx-implement] off-line
testing made easy |
|
Doug
How about having multiple configured versions of the same service
deployed with unique URLs?
Paul
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> For some of the scenarios we're looking at testing during the interop
> it might be hard for us to test them off-line without some kind of
> manual involvement. For example, how is the RMD supposed to
know if
> it should accept or reject the Offered sequence? I'd really
like for
> us to be able to test all of the scenarios automatically w/o requiring
> people to manually change some config setting. Off hand I can
think
> of two options:
> 1 - include some SOAP header that indicates the scenario # and then
> the RMD/Server can then act accordingly
> 2 - include some "testing directives" in a SOAP header.
Similar to #1
> but aren't tied to our scenario doc.
> Any other ideas?
>
> I'm partial to #2 then people can try scenarios that may not be
> included in our scenario doc. So what do people think of defining
a
> SOAP header (just for our testing purposes only) that include
> directives like:
>
> <RMDirectives>
> <acceptOffer> true|false </acceptOffer>
> <useOfferedSeq> true|false </useOfferedSeq> <!--
even when > Offered/Accepted, RMD creates its own seq -->
> </RMDirectives>
>
> Are there other options people can think of passing along? I'm
> thinking that these may need to be passed along on every message (and
> not just the createSeq) so that people have the most flexibility in
> their implementations.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> thanks,
> -Doug
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]