RE: [ws-rx-implement] soap 1.1 vs soap 1.2

["Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>]

> By using the XML [XML], SOAP [SOAP 1.1], [SOAP 1.2] and WSDL [WSDL 1.1] extensibility model,

 

I think the above text in CD3 [1] implies that either SOAP 1.1 or SOAP 1.2 can be used.  In addition Section 4 Faults also mentions how to use both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2.

 

While I completely agree that the interop event might be simpler and more successful if we constrain ourselves to one version of SOAP, I think the specification itself needs to normatively say what is required and/or permitted.

 

/paulc

 

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17184/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-03.pdf

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: March 20, 2006 5:40 PM
To: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-implement] soap 1.1 vs soap 1.2

 

After hitting a couple of endpoints I'm getting the feeling that it would make our lives a whole lot easier if we choose one soap version for the interop.  I know of at least one impl that appears to only support 1.1 at this time so I'd like to suggest that we only do soap 1.1 for now.  Thoughts?
-Doug