[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-implement] [Fwd: FW: about InteropScenarios 0.8,scenario 1.4]
I'm not sure I agree with this text. How about the following, I think it captures the intent of the proposal below. Replace: "The CreateSequenceResponse is the first message to be sent on the "back channel." With: "The CreateSequenceResponse may be sent on the HTTP back channel or, when possible, via a new HTTP connection to the ReplyTo URI. Clients must be prepared for either case." -----Original Message----- From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 3:26 AM To: ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ws-rx-implement] [Fwd: FW: about InteropScenarios 0.8, scenario 1.4] Forwarded from Jacques ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Durand, Jacques R. *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:19 PM *To:* ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org *Subject:* about InteropScenarios 0.8, scenario 1.4 (not sure I can post on this list yet... only "observer" so far - Paul can you forward to list in case? Thx.) Comment on Interop Scenarios 0.8: Scenario 1.4 should not state: "... The CreateSequenceResponse is the first message to be sent on the "back channel." " Indeed, the XML for CreateSequence messages does not use ReplyTo:anonymous (consistently with all other exchanges in this scenario) So this means the CSR SHOULD (not a MUST, though) be sent back on a new HTTP connection , per WSA SOAP binding spec (".. When "--/anonymous" is not specified for the response endpoint, then ... Any response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using the address value specified by response endpoint.") Propose to replace: " The CreateSequenceResponse is the first message to be sent on the "back channel." With: " The CreateSequenceResponse, like other response messages to RM protocol messages for sequence management, is sent over a new HTTP connection to the ReplyTo URI." Now, assuming some destination implementation may decide to not follow what is so far only a WSA recommendation, the client side should not choke on it. So one could add: "in case an RMD sends back these responses over the back-channel, the client must accept these." Jacques -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf paul@wso2.com "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]